Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns

Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> Mon, 20 November 2017 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <shane@time-travellers.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B166A1294C7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:37:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBs9ToSf4SPw for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:37:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time-travellers.nl.eu.org (c.time-travellers.nl.eu.org [IPv6:2a02:2770::21a:4aff:fea3:eeaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EBBF1294B9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [5.254.79.66] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by time-travellers.nl.eu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <shane@time-travellers.org>) id 1eGhcq-00028T-Iv for dnsop@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:40:21 +0000
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <D63482C5.8C365%lee@asgard.org> <F5D40ADD-5C88-4169-B17B-F74211C4DD6B@vpnc.org>
From: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
Message-ID: <fd6e4d7b-e972-21ed-d58e-e0c59a0ed2f8@time-travellers.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:37:00 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F5D40ADD-5C88-4169-B17B-F74211C4DD6B@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/yQTQPWlQl_JLqrl6lbY8-hBUnCk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:37:59 -0000

All,

Paul Hoffman:
> 
> On 16 Nov 2017, at 20:12, Lee Howard wrote:
> 
>> I updated this draft months ago, based on feedback from the previous
>> WGLC,
>> and it expired without comment. I’ve refreshed it, and would like to ask
>> again for reviews (especially if anything has changed in the past
>> year) and
>> another WGLC.
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns/
> 
> This version seems fine, even without specific recommendations. From the
> earlier discussion in the WG, it doesn't seem like there is agreement on
> recommendations, and the draft covers the methods that could be used in
> enough detail where an operator can decide what they want to do.

I also think this version is fine (probably I said so on an early review
call).

Frankly I'm kind of mystified that it doesn't move forward, as having
ANY recommendations for operators on how to deal with this problem seems
better than none - and indeed I think this document is about 15 years
late. :(

Cheers,

--
Shane