Re: [DNSOP] DNS versioning, was The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

"Woodworth, John R" <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com> Sat, 22 July 2017 05:13 UTC

Return-Path: <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DFE129ACD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5GTWrCHD3wTu for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lxdnp29m.centurylink.com (lxdnp29m.centurylink.com [155.70.32.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB7121294A2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lxomp90v.corp.intranet (emailout.qintra.com [151.117.203.59]) by lxdnp29m.centurylink.com (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6M5DG0b047729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 21 Jul 2017 23:13:16 -0600
Received: from lxomp90v.corp.intranet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lxomp90v.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6M5DBJg050859; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:13:11 -0500
Received: from lxomp07u.corp.intranet (lxomp81v.corp.intranet [151.117.18.14]) by lxomp90v.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6M5DBhT050856 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:13:11 -0500
Received: from lxomp07u.corp.intranet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lxomp07u.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6M5DBWD049216; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:13:11 -0500
Received: from vodcwhubex501.ctl.intranet (vodcwhubex501.ctl.intranet [151.117.206.27]) by lxomp07u.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6M5DAZd049211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:13:10 -0500
Received: from PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet ([169.254.1.120]) by vodcwhubex501.ctl.intranet ([151.117.206.27]) with mapi id 14.03.0339.000; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:13:10 -0500
From: "Woodworth, John R" <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com>
To: "'Andrew Sullivan'" <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
CC: "Woodworth, John R" <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] DNS versioning, was The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Thread-Index: AQHTANpDgEgN9xEOMEWNOGhWzVLUxqJb7Y7AgADKXwCAAFQZAIAADQMAgAI2gIA=
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 05:13:10 +0000
Message-ID: <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD0823474@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1707190347390.10419@ns0.nohats.ca> <20170719215749.2241.qmail@ary.lan> <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD081E78B@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1707200928290.4118@dhcp-8e4c.meeting.ietf.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1707201432160.4413@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20170720142122.ncrkwi27ghdwj2sq@mx4.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20170720142122.ncrkwi27ghdwj2sq@mx4.yitter.info>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [151.117.206.8]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/yXS673AxYmb_HkOtR1vxM8dL-GU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS versioning, was The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 05:13:25 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:34:48PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> > This basically means that BULK is a master-only feature, which implies
> > that there's no need for BULK to work across zone transfers, which
> > implies the need to standardize it for interop is almost nonexistent.
>
> I don't think that follows.
>
> The DNS market is, like the mail market did some while ago,
> undergoing a period of consolidation in which a fairly small number
> of people have a very large number of dependent customers.
> Unfortuantely, whereas mail is asynchronous, DNS is effectively
> synchronous: if the provder has a bad day and you can't get an
> answer the site is down.
> This means that customers want to have multiple different vendors
> as their master, and they want the secondaries of those sources to
> offer as much as possible the same features, even when various DNS
> Tricks are in use; and they want the downstreams to be using
> standard protocols.  The more we can make interoperate to support
> that, the better off those users are.
>

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for the feedback and support!


Thanks,
John

>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
-- THESE ARE THE DROIDS TO WHOM I REFER:
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.