[DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 07:11 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A2B126B71 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7U-iLqmR8j04 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FC59124D68 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id u132so27447697wmg.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=T6Q1/w5P8xnFJFefezrXb9KIXBtk5OjeuUZ/ldbnhBY=; b=uW06GKMUp+jZA3CbUHRiqoXxs9Ga6gRMf4SIpf2ffB2/uASemM+LIr7jIR6FdRmjBJ GXQAhbUWkDuuIkDehIF7HmPq6CKwhKQjjhUIoE0vpkJ0/v68+uffDWHQUhaL8S5TbAPS ZXkse3QuOlRkDIo76olUrzavDf0u45wDfd3K5QBCl24IoQdcu4S2Ibvua03OaMIqJcam NfVr5iLuV+K80S+Tu1numvFKuh0Kiou3SHHwuAmqlqAHA5NUIUsBtY6EqsBGpQzOszAt 5BJhctETNvgtUXP2X7bJAtj4agDfb1nXyGcpOqsYOP0VVdOXXmTql+IjReVs23dl/Cr5 iP5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=T6Q1/w5P8xnFJFefezrXb9KIXBtk5OjeuUZ/ldbnhBY=; b=t4InSUa6mHiJPvcSoh++1Y+kQbi8dKNIv8+oVx0bZ339aR3sJ5S5y/vLug+tEMHSFq 1khJm/6x535RiQaLW2nts+vy9Ij6wfHIvUk8WqTIEf/YLMLzUh90o+ituNWKokNWl9sz J6mJsP5ft+mA1ZnEpnaPb9F3xho/nLMseXGsxKOH7Mv7kNyXOgSOKpGurY2lfpV2R7G6 GTfwFDahwHEYa0/sIQJLLIFJY2TbqxRFRLICPrIAC9XFMpLensuWC99Z78FRe21BLRsr juQfVXdTAFhFo6xDUFVRxFCnO01om5MOXzGlvTa+TCuegs/Y+Ur9uPpz4XJftStOhw6s InKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1oOCe6suts1i2yIM2MtPVQ1JaazD0rH/VjxCV6meHqnPtosV8tX1TfThXlbN/gfwk0VRvt1bjiBpIjrA==
X-Received: by 10.28.113.200 with SMTP id d69mr21548134wmi.10.1489648286406; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.178.87 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:11:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+GSStfAiOs8R9Ob7+LVh0RAfPQ+AbbTFNuwsrKkO=EUWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146b264f3a428054ad3c4e6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/yl0pclSOBp2srKAnq5_HPueqUx0>
Subject: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:11:30 -0000

All

During the first WGLC of draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any, several issues were
raised by the working group that needed to be addressed. The Authors
addressed the issues, but the changes are enough that there should be a
second Working Group Last Call on the changes.

This begins a Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any.  The Document is
located here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any/

However, the changes that were made since the last WGLC can be found here:

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-03&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-04

Please take a few moments to refer the changes and let the working group
know if the document is ready to move forward.   We're mostly looking for
remaining issues that have not been addressed.

This WGLC ends on Thursday 30 March 2017.

Thanks

tim/suzanne