Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene@senki.org> Wed, 04 January 2017 06:17 UTC

Return-Path: <bgreene@senki.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B297129C3E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 22:17:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M1kxZ8T7Ezfm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 22:17:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp133.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp133.dfw.emailsrvr.com [67.192.241.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67729129668 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 22:17:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp13.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D40C12027B; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 01:17:43 -0500 (EST)
X-Auth-ID: bgreene@senki.org
Received: by smtp13.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: bgreene-AT-senki.org) with ESMTPSA id 06F0D203FD; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 01:17:42 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender-Id: bgreene@senki.org
Received: from sin-mpgjx.singapore.corp.akamai.com ([UNAVAILABLE]. [23.62.225.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.7.12); Wed, 04 Jan 2017 01:17:43 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene@senki.org>
In-Reply-To: <5932AEFF-E099-4175-A4FB-B1D7418028FF@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 14:17:39 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <07899541-1075-48C0-A4C2-588E012D020B@senki.org>
References: <20161229040637.GA26031@odin.ulthar.us> <20161229054559.31443.qmail@ary.lan> <20161231202731.GX13486@mournblade.imrryr.org> <5932AEFF-E099-4175-A4FB-B1D7418028FF@fugue.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ynM1ShMrJjZjx3y6jUy2-SSDrC4>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 06:17:45 -0000

> On Jan 1, 2017, at 6:00 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> There is no _way_ to make it easier for said outside forces to pressure providers.   They have the force of law on their side.   What we do makes no difference in that arena.   The arena in which it _does_ make a difference is protecting people from losing their homes because they got suckered by some malware that got into their personal records on their computer.
> 
> IOW, the argument you are presenting has nothing to do with the choice that faces us.   If you want to make the case for rpz being a bad thing, the argument you should be making would have to show why protecting people in this way is the wrong solution to the problem, and why some other solution to the problem (e.g., a blacklist in the browser) is less bad.
> 
> Can’t we have that conversation, instead of these repeated assertions about things over which we have no control?

+1