Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv

Warren Kumari <> Fri, 23 August 2019 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7714112004D for <>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YoX-XPA064ML for <>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 618681200E6 for <>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id p13so8477818qkg.13 for <>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yYTKQYnBOW8TwXTiSaVR76UgMlmQ/Dz37Xg8Susz/BA=; b=Ohtt2QOL9TBFX2TneS8Zg1EJN/vOOFr+qSe+wrmSkKkANiFEkPvZ27ur7MqvjRbzoT P7eimqYQE4ZfpwS7R7aJhQ+ED4UYr6Lod1NE7/Y1OuAC4H8graomCuU2mpUPhHpDiFQi c633Vbj9nW1Yu+i/R7c4gFWnkCG0V94LyRWMeArkGm5YNVEEKSkPJVC2Zr5TXSjhF9nH zfY5rQKrmTYOi1VfW2DpZ0TmoGyIN0yTelbTYFr5HJEHxC5IGpDz6Rq/vcn2Af59cdyA UDS/5hHEwurz4XDnHy7hQGtKL4J9NtIfNj7vk8FS4VRTOWzUOOcCWbtpLQGLQIYIYAWv Iytw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yYTKQYnBOW8TwXTiSaVR76UgMlmQ/Dz37Xg8Susz/BA=; b=PzTuwNr+2lhN+4lyMDoO70DUqDpWTn3F5Qe/vBb1zBw4RsA+gcIlp9OQgM/Nxfajdh jlYged9t53hs9uoSBrN6UnLXJOrSbfgIJ5OOVbboS45o6aYrL/YNsfGtz1hIcEgJfRzm lFuVQhkbxbKBV3a1l2paGzghYtMhkhCZH99vXBVulfNlMY3E/8hRzgyjgzkm7xHNg3On h30fHL0E3PsSYzyQNEbkoOxbCGx6M9RAL+lkv4wALlESw9wzzJr9JaY/14PJh85wB4hz KUdzdyI/vTvRgrMfjV9LrqwJBPZciiQrBhYywhzpJCDwpD4tmdU7vb4Bkmr7tb23g7dB nvEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUK59Q6/+C/kgTd2enWNZ1TopndQx/dZ3CcLSS75XLwLySlLYK1 SqynvL5htLxsBwFeulS/L0xwPMVbr7smXlYg5h7Zyg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx/lgsToWp7BzW7W2MCQJqs5QI9Dm8hGSTvh2L+LZxTw70cIQfmzoS7IVJREcdgUkQf3QQQR8uSPeV9rhYOi6M=
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:c107:: with SMTP id z7mr4628022qki.245.1566574221734; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Warren Kumari <>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:29:44 -0400
Message-ID: <>
To: Tim Wicinski <>
Cc: dnsop <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:30:25 -0000

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:23 AM Tim Wicinski <> wrote:
> All
> Sorry for the delay, the IETF moves very few RFCs to Historic
> (thats' another discussion), but all looks like ready to move forward

Indeed. This document looks good to me, but for process wonkery
reasons it needs to be WGLC'ed and then sent to me so I can attach a
"status-change" note and then progress it.

Thanks to the authors and WG for this, and sorry for the annoyance.

> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv
> Current versions of the draft is available here:
> The Current Intended Status of this document is moving these to Historic
> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments.
> If this does not seem appropriate please speak out.
> If someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with your reasons.
> This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on:  3 September 2019
> thanks
> tim
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list

I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.