[DNSOP] algrithm-update table

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 27 March 2017 19:39 UTC

Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:39:06 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170327193906.GA35958@mx4.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zBE1FJQV2XRpsulhL7sWqUsd51w>
Subject: [DNSOP] algrithm-update table
Precedence: list

Hi,

Further to the comments I made at the mic today, I didn't dig into the
history on this, but the syntactic agreement that we finally came up
with when we had this bunfight years ago was is in RFC 6944.  The idea
a the time was that we'd product updates of that.  The publication
date claims 2013, but I recall the fight happening in 2012.  The
datatracker might say more -- Pete Resnick held the discuss on this
for a long time.

The table there is on p 3.

If you update that document, it will avoid the table fight.

I personally like the table format better too, but it was painful to
go through LC last time.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

[DNSOP] algrithm-update table Andrew Sullivan