[DNSOP] algrithm-update table

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 27 March 2017 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3DC12785F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=CPXabCq1; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=LtJDqAFh
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r2SYuWCCYH94 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.yitter.info (mx4.yitter.info [159.203.56.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40F37129498 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CFEBB82E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:39:09 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1490643549; bh=PbFCEhsnxVJO2aqJUB0HMbTe0EOFVt58Wm+XHVNvLLs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=CPXabCq1jJL6W8wGoR+ye4Fzw9JXpAVukESUY2XiR9fdh8DepwMTdcKqUNH8kcSRd enp5V5aK+BJWoF5Mk5fllQMGkW5AZH5VEiWAjj/Ramf8MJJw1VqzwA00y+PRWooUVk h4UyWAD5VZ8Ng3xwTX4TJ+PJBwUtr/aqOaxdpNb0=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx4.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OXyxb6AZa9S9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:39:08 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:39:06 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1490643548; bh=PbFCEhsnxVJO2aqJUB0HMbTe0EOFVt58Wm+XHVNvLLs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=LtJDqAFhN5l5Q6qkqPP5j6L1ubCqOeOOoYTKiKwYZfaMNnMWGwQaee67+3bTIa9a1 VyxSNsz4i01S4VwXeFIrJrHL9yK/+MX8KVk+s9eTZD9g1RwLD7VMDmMFLPrFXFdmHE FD525O0NFYYRvFck4KJIDgrz5xaKvV6sSGFxC4uU=
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170327193906.GA35958@mx4.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zBE1FJQV2XRpsulhL7sWqUsd51w>
Subject: [DNSOP] algrithm-update table
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:39:42 -0000

Hi,

Further to the comments I made at the mic today, I didn't dig into the
history on this, but the syntactic agreement that we finally came up
with when we had this bunfight years ago was is in RFC 6944.  The idea
a the time was that we'd product updates of that.  The publication
date claims 2013, but I recall the fight happening in 2012.  The
datatracker might say more -- Pete Resnick held the discuss on this
for a long time.

The table there is on p 3.

If you update that document, it will avoid the table fight.

I personally like the table format better too, but it was painful to
go through LC last time.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com