Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303-00

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 09 December 2013 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E421AE4BD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 11:07:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fWRygVdoLNfj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 11:07:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C861AE4B9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 11:07:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-0-66-41.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rB9J7j2L015103 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:07:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-0-66-41.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.41] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <EC406A74-D342-46CD-8241-DEAFAE477319@hopcount.ca>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 11:07:49 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A5912329-3253-4258-808D-95FC30132F52@vpnc.org>
References: <52A329C4.8050501@teamaol.com> <E7568EE8-99D1-422B-9B24-40D6D0CFE118@virtualized.org> <EC406A74-D342-46CD-8241-DEAFAE477319@hopcount.ca>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:07:52 -0000

On Dec 9, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:

> 5. Leave both registries as-is, publish Mark's document as-is, and work on a separate registry clean-up draft later, since I am guessing that work will not be uncontentious and the guidance provided by the draft at hand is sufficiently useful not to stall.

+1

There is no need to conflate the trivial addition of this for the benefit of the community with the mind-numbing process issues.

--Paul Hoffman