IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re: Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf)

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 01 March 2016 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39AF1B4326 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 15:15:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.137
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gbUchQsmdgyp for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 15:15:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8F3C1B4325 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 15:15:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 23682 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2016 23:15:22 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=5c81.56d6228a.k1603; bh=EIP8UadxzmZrdxLGsxf2SuXt89hVeCrjlRbrJYtEa3E=; b=EiIXBkwKGYe7lZSmNEOHHIy+6BnuNPB2Nw7nTrqEFfM6km1qyUSFNJzA+wDEkxK4p9UsLWOhwV8dx7LLFXcENI+NxNT8bct35x7d2R849hR70OlnhRCuVfqX1yZ0snshXHcNEi0SeQz/5uJFWYx53MEev8tDW/pCsz95sUkW2Vwnqs5hNK4SfIzAeLm/eKYn0pxz/ftFWJtuZI1W7UdbLM/FwRD0VYYmtMoj+pjUG8sHjZustKlX+M2yoIkatuLi
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=5c81.56d6228a.k1603; bh=EIP8UadxzmZrdxLGsxf2SuXt89hVeCrjlRbrJYtEa3E=; b=LTxa7nM9DbZ8Ip1e5CoqKSZEFb4zxxMdGQH6HDe9FuT+1zICQkMDq7twGb3kYoTkjGw1JLlR8qdNWVwGBq+iQzSLdFMX4lx2fT5FaE/Nx5Q4Oissu2f2UI4garxXHOvpaY6q7+8LnFG3SIvbfBmZyc433JNu2UrtqUrEFqhNAZpC1FmRyVt8ar53mqtmPr9Ck54TYI/37pH048wbc8CyxGnzRFbf5vWC0tvtedFS8qL5p95bfzB4kc/Hq5vSrB5G
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 01 Mar 2016 23:15:22 -0000
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:15:22 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1603011813560.36649@ary.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160301225138.53AFB438DCC1@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <20160301165633.71260.qmail@ary.lan> <56D5CA62.1030206@bellis.me.uk> <CAMm+LwjJ0xe2wDW98JHJfV5jV3xTeuMNguU=rkqrZMzmei2iHA@mail.gmail.com> <20160301225138.53AFB438DCC1@rock.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zJW2Bwokk6fgGaQVI8gJL7_q-l0>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re: Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:15:26 -0000

>> The NDR record is deliberately free format because changing DNS
>> servers is HARD, no really it is ridiculously hard with a ten year
>> lag. Which is of course why we won't use a new record at all:
>
> Really?  We have rpm's of new versions of named supplied within
> hours of ISC's public announcements of new named releases.  I'm
> sure there are similar announcements for other nameserver vendors.

I suppose I could say web based configuration crudware a few dozen more 
times, but I doubt it would sink in any more than it has before.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email