[DNSOP] extended deadline Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Fri, 07 April 2017 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEA212946E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AUXWdR9HThKl for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C297126DED for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id p22so62746388qka.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 06:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=yYAaLlFDOJ7LY1rot13xQXPbVpy2yhRBxSW4tMfOeLk=; b=cFr7v+f0+iQuBFpc6EqC/DJQ9goD6PZUEVcs0p7Bn98SY0r+RxMdoy7iMZUS1AS5CG 0IFsFlgg0SJOEQBMP4D9hVQhz86oSZAdc3YdbgAO/eTkOn9ejIk6VsiVp5109DYpTsvf gPzXO4a4uCPOf1Fdeb3k9RDQ643GfXA7+vv7uQBSX4p62nYzdse+qIkgWPoGzmFbKPtr tDquKwVI+7OxMmOJ2eCgIWvxw7Fb8/pnlXdB1YtGT8x9VBCVSuvwlhczM4FQxd6w+iuU qzm+2h+NcQu+qLpBIHxy0LHggf16l7hdwyTucGtIaYTsrFTx6rdvrr4SqzwvSLj/elby WQjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=yYAaLlFDOJ7LY1rot13xQXPbVpy2yhRBxSW4tMfOeLk=; b=l+MA3htFsCiwC37CczG7pBB+D/01TwWpM2FcD9vh2095QwWyMoGToo7YiwWYWoWxxp THQQh21+AffGprdmtJioTyuXyftYRgOU6x6asWppGXfijPYjAe+/R2s0FCvRCDpcF0sV Sak1IQwOLec5SQmekWVvNWQb8mz/MipK6ixpBtweYWU+AeYD60x/pcSj/u3F0JvsVAWu kz1GpLXrW0Is0TX4CqV2MIcMmOXu44wYkk0OxPCvCz0+FRxBBJzR6qEd2uTtHAq3TQGw X0WvabX3yJyseI+yn77s17po8YG4kbXZV9+fePkKIjppkcKPzEDc5tSww/tH/V2WyqHq znEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0iaJ6vorJMs+F+DB3goMO8vef8/qVautcLJNrsxAEsc3oELVVueuGAnmoq+aUSxA==
X-Received: by with SMTP id y128mr25215304qkb.291.1491572290668; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 06:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ([]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z29sm3041600qtz.67.2017. (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Apr 2017 06:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170401201727.GA5948@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:38:08 -0400
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D3AA90CF-667A-4C4D-8ABF-DB8242E31A1D@gmail.com>
References: <333CCE99-82E2-44C9-97ED-2222540097ED@gmail.com> <20170401201727.GA5948@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zMchuCtfZU4jYFR5AEkAF1RB9wg>
Subject: [DNSOP] extended deadline Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 13:38:16 -0000


We had initially scheduled the WGLC on this document to be over by now. However, the flurry of activity around the review we were asked to do on the homenet-dot draft, and the general traffic level on the list during IETF 98, suggested to the chairs that we should extend the WGLC.

We’re hereby formally extending it to next Wednesday, April 12.

As always for WGLC— we need to hear both support and opposition for taking this draft to the next step in the process.

Suzanne  & TIm

> On Apr 1, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 07:20:55PM -0400,
> Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> wrote 
> a message of 92 lines which said:
>> This message opens a Working Group Last Call for:
>> "The ALT Special Use Top Level Domain"
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/>
> I've read -08 and I believe I understand this draft. I'm not convinced
> it's useful (most users of alternative resolution systems won't use it
> and, anyway, I'm not even sure it will be added in the Special-Use
> registry, which was wrongly frozen by the IESG) but I don't see big
> issues with the draft, it seems to me it correctly describes the new
> TLD.
> Editorial :
> Section 1:
> "and that should not be resolved" I cannot parse it. Missing "it"?
> Section 5 :
> After "and anyone watching queries along the path", add a reference to
> RFC 7626?
> Normative references:
> Why is RFC 6303 a normative reference? It is no longer used.
> Why is RFC 7686 a normative reference? It is just an example.