Re: [DNSOP] CDS polling, was Re: [Ext] Re: Clarifying referrals (#35)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 15 November 2017 04:59 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB73A128AB0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:59:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o4r76C7Rb_qH for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:59:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 057681288A9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:59:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ycBxP280qz39g; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:59:21 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1510721961; bh=8zTwY9xk8R+7yy2s8Ac04SnC0e1D6EM2BFO5t6ygk98=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=q+384bXa8WaPRiC+mlsP03kNsMTfQspoDJ3zeT3c2sStgxocASGKJATSk2F2UbKzE 0rxL4q9KbL9E9ytH86MOo5lPcylDAKablx9Pk67z09vv7SiF19aFeG+bMnthovoFNW ViLZ0VscK97LpnbWIe+M+ZgYUIwN6p8w+mY467YI=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3nxh-GwWTx-H; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:59:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:59:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F8BC62D29; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 23:59:19 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 4F8BC62D29
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F00B40D35AF; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 23:59:19 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 23:59:19 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Jacques Latour <Jacques.Latour@cira.ca>
cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <D630AC64.61036%jacques.latour@cira.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1711142358030.30054@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <20171113014445.ncldrwnuuvluecx7@mx4.yitter.info> <5A08FD96.8030907@redbarn.org> <20171113020736.ga7rzgst2hurb56h@mx4.yitter.info> <5A09068A.3030206@redbarn.org> <20171113032640.tbn7icsllm6jeeny@mx4.yitter.info> <C9AC653C-9A27-4DA3-A0FA-9F1BFD429962@icann.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1711131456200.26046@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20171113183004.GA35038@isc.org> <436111CF-FCA8-44A2-B83D-6540DE6D64AC@icann.org> <66BA5F27-B044-459B-A2B2-54221FD768C6@isc.org> <20171113233756.GA37394@isc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1711140941060.14243@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <D630AC64.61036%jacques.latour@cira.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zORtg96mmuncZiK75AcFFsrBjSg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] CDS polling, was Re: [Ext] Re: Clarifying referrals (#35)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 04:59:24 -0000

On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Jacques Latour wrote:

> Personally, I like a mix of #3 and #1, on a regular basis poll the entire
> zone for changes, and have a mechanism to listen to child notifications
> for urgent changes.

Agreed.

> _AND_ remember, the preferred method by far is to submit a DS/DNSKEY
> record is via the RRR EPP model.  The above is when that RRR EPP model is
> non functional.

That preference might be political not technical. I personally like the
DNS based solutions over the EPP based one, because it requires no
humans or webgui's :)

Paul