Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-02.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 09 March 2015 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A92F1A8967 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.16
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.16 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g9x3CMcZ9KTm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C79A61A895B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 76F4F28059C; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:13:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72351280538; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:13:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650504C0053; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:12:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:12:35 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Message-ID: <20150309141235.GA4605@nic.fr>
References: <20150304125319.14932.18909.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+nkc8B+rOiq+f6dP6o3uFSH+J+q04Q-6eADSpXj0kE_R2bRHQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+nkc8B+rOiq+f6dP6o3uFSH+J+q04Q-6eADSpXj0kE_R2bRHQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 8.0
X-Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-686-pae i686
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zQTTtpUkQzlavcpNqkUrdlyIaNk>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:13:30 -0000

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 08:10:11AM -0500,
 Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> wrote 
 a message of 218 lines which said:

> I think the change in section 4 "Performance implications" is incorrect:

This was reported by a native english speaker and committed here
<https://github.com/bortzmeyer/my-IETF-work/commit/4d8c75529ccec0cea334d78a665f73ebde27d897#diff-64cb8059630496a308f9d7d0f81ff316L197>

If I understand you, "inferior" in english has only the meaning "not
as good as" and never "fewer than" (which may be a good thing, which
is the case here)?