IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Ed's comment s on Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 16 February 2017 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE395129695 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:46:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jT6H4-IZdSpw for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:46:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6B601270B4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:46:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D023300435 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:46:35 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 6hyPfIuY3pHi for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:46:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.5.245.234] (wsip-98-172-24-238.dc.dc.cox.net [98.172.24.238]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00254300254; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:46:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <A4F1EFFD-FC65-4C69-92E8-A6587AD767EF@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_98C3E2EF-CA66-40DB-8E22-D1DBB93A223B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:46:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <F56640AF-27DF-425F-B844-8453DE02987E@icann.org>
To: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
References: <F56640AF-27DF-425F-B844-8453DE02987E@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zTNH__IvVWd-htzWjva4Xl8UaYA>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Ed's comment s on Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:46:37 -0000

Ed:

> #    Special-Use Domain Names [RFC6761] created an IANA registry for
> #    special-use Domain Names [SDO-IANA-SUDR], defined policies for adding
> #    to the registry, and made some suggestions about how that policy
> #    might be implemented.  Since the publication of RFC 6761, the IETF
> #    has been asked to designate several new special-use Domain Names in
> #    this registry.  During the evaluation process for these special-use
> 
> It would be good to provide a list of requests for new special use names.
> Especially for a problem statement, this provides a way to estimate the 
> "size and shape" of the problem and the urgency.

No matter how you count, the volume will remain small if this is done properly.  However, the special name requests can still be important and urgent.

Russ

v2.16.0 | Report a Bug | By Email