Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr
Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl> Wed, 28 March 2018 15:37 UTC
Return-Path: <matthijs@pletterpet.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFE9127369 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-iWX3gJRc3e for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud8.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud8.xs4all.net [194.109.24.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CD0B120047 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:981:19be:1:a104:4f71:de86:2e0] ([IPv6:2001:981:19be:1:a104:4f71:de86:2e0]) by smtp-cloud8.xs4all.net with ESMTPSA id 1D91fMZPN4EsM1D92fI7Mg; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:37:49 +0200
To: Richard Gibson <richard.j.gibson@oracle.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <d7c4fc25-9d4b-d934-bad3-61e7b8364ca2@pletterpet.nl> <ac97b4e4-d940-e758-546d-b0cdf44a9091@oracle.com>
From: Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl>
Message-ID: <cdc7b559-6c81-7934-8947-665a136b9862@pletterpet.nl>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:37:47 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ac97b4e4-d940-e758-546d-b0cdf44a9091@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfH8Y55jNFUbHjQvcNzctsLwRserhlGp3Y2BbQZ+s+/lcrHyd85XR2Brkai4+HeVTurdL2tvj65xo2pyIrvEAwyzxAVHSxFNiuBIiw94N2rSGuQ/N01Ow p0ACizIGV/EFtRCtuh5U0o9oA9bPWrI+rgo0F6BfqD6yFkuhiXj+m+wnVaPazqNXx/SU2u+dlATKQOsOi3uSIn0WgPLtk8ro5Zw3E5R9PdiEbC0eQv3CIcv+ gXKV+6Id1P9CbfyQU2H96bp/tFiNyLIRjWNDpZruEz8C+8A3E/ZTt740B/9f69Ln7tlNiWGTJJINSoXEYNQWwQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zY-j3239m7exvgFeHC_Q54UaMx0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:37:52 -0000
Richard, On 03/28/2018 04:44 PM, Richard Gibson wrote: > I really like this document, especially the changes to version 02. Thanks:) > One comment: Section 3.6 (Replace an RRset) specifies that "RDLENGTH > must be non-zero" _and_ that "The same syntax is used to delete an RRset > and to replace an RRset with an RR whose RDLENGTH is zero". I think the > former should be dropped; replacing an RRset with a new record having > zero RDLENGTH is disambiguated by containing section so there is no > reason to prohibit it. Right. But we use RDLENGTH must be zero in the case to delete a whole RRset. So I do like to have some words to clarify it. But you are right that it is not a requirement. Best regards, Matthijs > > > On 03/28/2018 09:31 AM, Matthijs Mekking wrote: >> All, >> >> It's been a while, but I have put up a new version of the MIXFR draft: >> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dmekking-2Dmixfr-2D02&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=-o8MJF7i0TzXAJRB0ncfTVfWKSyTG7nl_iTLU_A2B7c&m=ycKKp45O3W2Hpn8RR_KFXUQy24YUrGwBK2HlmyMhCnI&s=9E3JS209vJp6dQBpJJBXlr32ZbLYLOLNNAiovQ1iAnY&e= >> >> >> The IETF 101 Hackathon lead to the revival of this draft. >> >> Changes after the three year sleep: >> >> - I removed the IXFR Gone Wild section. This document should focus in >> the in-band transfer improvements. I know there are others who like to >> see and work on a new DNS transfer protocol, but one does not exclude >> the other. >> - Intended status: Standards track. >> - Added a clarification from Bob Harold about class ANY (from 2015). >> - Remove ambiguous "Delete All RRsets of a Type". >> - Affiliation changes. >> >> Who would like to contribute, review, and all that great fun? >> >> Github is here: >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_matje_mixfr&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=-o8MJF7i0TzXAJRB0ncfTVfWKSyTG7nl_iTLU_A2B7c&m=ycKKp45O3W2Hpn8RR_KFXUQy24YUrGwBK2HlmyMhCnI&s=9jcbJIa5DBxRHlL2wVDEwCWBJXvbZffQobFtQvjEMH0&e= >> >> >> Best regards, >> Matthijs >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_dnsop&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=-o8MJF7i0TzXAJRB0ncfTVfWKSyTG7nl_iTLU_A2B7c&m=ycKKp45O3W2Hpn8RR_KFXUQy24YUrGwBK2HlmyMhCnI&s=n1GMn0ZrYJoVbOVyFWt2A2n2n6d5T3xoCwjdK8xsbiw&e= >> >
- [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Pieter Lexis
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr tjw ietf
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Frederico A C Neves
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Frederico A C Neves
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Frederico A C Neves
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Frederico A C Neves
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Frederico A C Neves
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Frederico A C Neves
- Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr Frederico A C Neves