Re: [DNSOP] partial glue is not enough, I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt

Havard Eidnes <he@uninett.no> Tue, 07 July 2020 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <he@uninett.no>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3FE3A113E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=uninett.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id guWtzQ6HjWR3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smistad.uninett.no (smistad.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:0:eeb1:d7ff:fe59:fbaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F76A3A1157 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smistad.uninett.no (smistad.uninett.no [158.38.62.77]) by smistad.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B84143E9A2; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 18:57:57 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uninett.no; s=he201803; t=1594141077; bh=FOkjc0c7YQluD2kWsyFEoXao9fp51rKokxxvI2hvx+Y=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HPysSOF35UQqPCe+Wj6onZ5DtMvPvj16tkES0kto/gVWe6JTDHpNRnNG8UCWKeQSu uzIe0H1u9m5aVmDVAbf8RAzwt7uAWyHGocPsdJy73ZcE8y33iC8jAultENo5LyFEaF TbAqOsLgh3NO0bgo6svLQfKrv7KxM4ABiCjGzK5c=
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 18:57:57 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <20200707.185757.1999965638503421214.he@uninett.no>
To: paul@redbarn.org
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, johnl@taugh.com
From: Havard Eidnes <he@uninett.no>
In-Reply-To: <1738263.TRGBkWWA7Y@linux-9daj>
References: <20200702011816.D4B0D1C3CD10@ary.qy> <2843010.V8yvLItfke@linux-9daj> <1738263.TRGBkWWA7Y@linux-9daj>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zaXS97MOwQkdialHBlV4R34I0gA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] partial glue is not enough, I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 16:58:06 -0000

>> this is the draft where that issue would be decided, so it's
>> good we're talking about it. ...
>
> by the way, this is what kato and i, and later jabley, were
> trying to get at with
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize/
>
> but it was like moving mud with a toothpick, so after eleven
> years (2003 to 2014) we gave it up. there are probably some
> good ideas in there, even now.

I've read it, and most of it makes perfect sense to me (I think I
have one paragraph I'd like to discuss).

When you say it was like "moving mud with a toothpick", was there
any active opposition to the draft, or was it just a lack of
engagement?

Regards,

- Håvard