Re: [DNSOP] partial glue is not enough, I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt

Havard Eidnes <> Tue, 07 July 2020 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3FE3A113E for <>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id guWtzQ6HjWR3 for <>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:700:1:0:eeb1:d7ff:fe59:fbaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F76A3A1157 for <>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B84143E9A2; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 18:57:57 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=he201803; t=1594141077; bh=FOkjc0c7YQluD2kWsyFEoXao9fp51rKokxxvI2hvx+Y=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HPysSOF35UQqPCe+Wj6onZ5DtMvPvj16tkES0kto/gVWe6JTDHpNRnNG8UCWKeQSu uzIe0H1u9m5aVmDVAbf8RAzwt7uAWyHGocPsdJy73ZcE8y33iC8jAultENo5LyFEaF TbAqOsLgh3NO0bgo6svLQfKrv7KxM4ABiCjGzK5c=
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 18:57:57 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <>
From: Havard Eidnes <>
In-Reply-To: <1738263.TRGBkWWA7Y@linux-9daj>
References: <20200702011816.D4B0D1C3CD10@ary.qy> <2843010.V8yvLItfke@linux-9daj> <1738263.TRGBkWWA7Y@linux-9daj>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] partial glue is not enough, I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 16:58:06 -0000

>> this is the draft where that issue would be decided, so it's
>> good we're talking about it. ...
> by the way, this is what kato and i, and later jabley, were
> trying to get at with
> but it was like moving mud with a toothpick, so after eleven
> years (2003 to 2014) we gave it up. there are probably some
> good ideas in there, even now.

I've read it, and most of it makes perfect sense to me (I think I
have one paragraph I'd like to discuss).

When you say it was like "moving mud with a toothpick", was there
any active opposition to the draft, or was it just a lack of


- Håvard