[DNSOP] [psuger@gmail.com: RFID Test Class]

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 29 September 2009 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C8D3A67F9 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.803
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.803 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.969, BAYES_40=-0.185, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zWI-SaozaEzT for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (mx2.nic.fr [192.134.4.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFD63A6778 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B4631C00E6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:25:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435921C00D8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:25:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411467B0035 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:25:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:25:59 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20090929122559.GC12019@nic.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 5.0.2
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject: [DNSOP] [psuger@gmail.com: RFID Test Class]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:29:41 -0000

This request seems more appropriate here, IMHO.
--- Begin Message ---
Dear colleagues,

I am a member of a lead user project planning to run real live RFID use
tests. This test intends to use the [RFC 5395] Private Use 0xFFF0, 65520
Class as "PERFID" (for Provisional Experimentation RFID) since there is no
Experimentation Classes assigned.

I wished to know if the use of that class could colide with some other
experimentation or utilization someone would run or know..
Thank you

P. Suger
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--- End Message ---