Re: [DNSOP] DNS versioning, was The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

"Woodworth, John R" <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com> Sat, 22 July 2017 05:07 UTC

Return-Path: <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A8B12741D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id laJTsJd-luaq for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lxdnp29m.centurylink.com (lxdnp29m.centurylink.com [155.70.32.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B954126C2F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lxomp90v.corp.intranet (lxomp90v.corp.intranet [151.117.203.59]) by lxdnp29m.centurylink.com (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6M56wBc042466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 21 Jul 2017 23:06:58 -0600
Received: from lxomp90v.corp.intranet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lxomp90v.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6M56r7I037641; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:06:53 -0500
Received: from lxomp06u.corp.intranet (lxomp81v.corp.intranet [151.117.18.14]) by lxomp90v.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6M56r3b037638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:06:53 -0500
Received: from lxomp06u.corp.intranet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lxomp06u.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6M56qku019663; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:06:53 -0500
Received: from vodcwhubex502.ctl.intranet (vodcwhubex502.ctl.intranet [151.117.206.28]) by lxomp06u.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6M56qi3019660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:06:52 -0500
Received: from PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet ([169.254.1.120]) by vodcwhubex502.ctl.intranet ([151.117.206.28]) with mapi id 14.03.0339.000; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:06:52 -0500
From: "Woodworth, John R" <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com>
To: "'Tony Finch'" <dot@dotat.at>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
CC: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, "paul@nohats.ca" <paul@nohats.ca>, "Woodworth, John R" <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] DNS versioning, was The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Thread-Index: AQHTANpDgEgN9xEOMEWNOGhWzVLUxqJb7Y7AgADKXwCAAFQZAIACPvOQ
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 05:06:51 +0000
Message-ID: <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD0823445@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1707190347390.10419@ns0.nohats.ca> <20170719215749.2241.qmail@ary.lan> <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD081E78B@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1707200928290.4118@dhcp-8e4c.meeting.ietf.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1707201432160.4413@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1707201432160.4413@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [151.117.206.8]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zqoVc83FqmBCdn0DfpsrXzV9-p0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS versioning, was The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 05:07:03 -0000

> From: Tony Finch [mailto:dot@dotat.at]
>

Hi Tony,

Thanks for the feedback.

>
> John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> >
> > BULK absolutely requires online DNSSEC signing,
>
> This basically means that BULK is a master-only feature, which
> implies that there's no need for BULK to work across zone
> transfers, which implies the need to standardize it for
> interop is almost nonexistent.
>

Although BULK does actually offer an offline DNSSEC signing
solution, no such solution is required for unsigned zones which
today is where all the implementations I am aware of live anyway.


Thanks,
John

>
> Tony.
> --
> f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I
> xn--zr8h punycode Lundy, Fastnet, Irish Sea: South or southwest
> becoming cyclonic, 5 to 7, perhaps gale 8 later. Moderate or
> rough, becoming rough or very rough later in Fastnet and west
> Lundy. Rain or thundery showers. Good, occasionally poor.
-- THESE ARE THE DROIDS TO WHOM I REFER:
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.