Re: [dnsoverhttp] Thinking about inlining DNS in HTTP
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 16 September 2016 16:44 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsoverhttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsoverhttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B05812B255
for <dnsoverhttp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id LjF-G7QAtQkZ for <dnsoverhttp@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22b.google.com (mail-qt0-x22b.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9A7312B1E0
for <dnsoverhttp@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 38so45703693qte.1
for <dnsoverhttp@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=TiT9v+wGT5dPXx97AyeGv4r5cU0ogjuGgi6AaM/kQjU=;
b=Jx3gVFxPNuuio5LJWzB3cMxR1/kllJA2G8WUOrRcqWQD5IvecDBpbmRb/yWQth05mG
ZEMEz4TgPtlEyOh3I1RVtYkUzdRDP/S2fOCcf8ljEDULNOQGL5fbuF4+Aspvu2seQdEj
0jfngikSE0xNjM5c15pRsmBJspib/8unKgnGp1MVMN9QeFUGul+pMMRaaRs3P1jcGnpI
Jh8a07dPZAi3HpMCXUhIxKQL6EE6hryF6pW7tpmludPpt+K+r1WSF/xV2bcGrY8+6aZU
tzoS8QxW1jtagC/b/iz1K5odONmbEoBIQoTfXEc1qOK0JIpruEMdiyxSlWJk9EQdffjc
OTCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=TiT9v+wGT5dPXx97AyeGv4r5cU0ogjuGgi6AaM/kQjU=;
b=QZ+jw4qy3jY8Bp+3LDkIhJkAl7Y9KpaJc/Qevt8frAAABJrSY2nT6L235xbNpi/0Kf
m8zPvER5MN0aZgKW4IZA1BKugx8CqllFnQcUhaYNqKEgyPrSUKSV+kJKF0VtZf2x8oEq
at2kglctZUPNoWzm6Q9x1+woNwHZTIBcH8OMUp1NbnXLKJ/wRWV729/wri7xNiGTrxtb
P/vIY87F6hZw087JJQvYRjnVp3pyVUGk3FbD8RXwueDYf3g7yhJy8qv/Koigt2UpZtGM
W9+zloCSjfUnhld3qjEtgf87nOEwHlnZvbYtjxUX5sOBasB5Nv0eSBoStTjg2jewoOhz
ex+Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOnS8SFN60OEiX4yWRidYFti+MExSmLEQ4tQbAD7xpXZgzj5riQQ/V/bYO4rnKy/D7kTLQFEiSZQwSn8w==
X-Received: by 10.200.39.201 with SMTP id x9mr16889294qtx.3.1474044274889;
Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.22.146 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNqBUacK5oCs3V4sYi+F3Yhqf2e5NiNC1LuPz+jAeuQ4gw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOdDvNqBUacK5oCs3V4sYi+F3Yhqf2e5NiNC1LuPz+jAeuQ4gw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:44:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWFj4iRszwRFbAJ9Zs-V5j=qntEiDT8YgyyFS=t8NcSPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsoverhttp/FGgTQGErWMxonLDqYe4qANt51p0>
Cc: dnsoverhttp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsoverhttp] Thinking about inlining DNS in HTTP
X-BeenThere: dnsoverhttp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of DNS over HTTP <dnsoverhttp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsoverhttp>,
<mailto:dnsoverhttp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsoverhttp/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsoverhttp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsoverhttp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsoverhttp>,
<mailto:dnsoverhttp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 16:44:38 -0000
On 16 September 2016 at 09:29, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote: > Anyone want to talk about the general model of pushing DNS records to > clients as part of HTTP? This was originally part of the SPDY documents, but > was never fully implemented there and never made it into HTTP/2 due to its > experimental and speculative nature (unlike the rest of what became h2). But > a number of folks, including myself, think the idea still holds significant > promise. If we go with the notion that you can use RFC 4501 and GET, then HTTP/2 server push will just work. That's a powerful notion.
- [dnsoverhttp] Thinking about inlining DNS in HTTP Patrick McManus
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Thinking about inlining DNS in … Martin Thomson
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Thinking about inlining DNS in … Patrick McManus