Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 16 September 2016 16:29 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsoverhttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsoverhttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D7412B2BB
for <dnsoverhttp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id l4aDMjENyTMB for <dnsoverhttp@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB35412B2C2
for <dnsoverhttp@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id r126so117958632oib.0
for <dnsoverhttp@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=1wUFMUIpqMc53z8bMRQbMIp8JMWnDPvnVaD3d/iIdzM=;
b=Akp2yJPOtfEKIk9aIg8185jXQtPh3253S9HbhRCtJtHyOiu+vPVKy0ut4NuQFi6/Fp
h9BesRg5grWPU/tQclyVZ3DV73WVYhByIgAU14auQGsLVmeXduSaeyxxtlebHzL4dA+R
8rurgiMIh8oQmkxu/qT1d/2SYlkjFE4jWFma06Scj/YIAS1JxIQMMQik3HrDbN/J5/Pq
GMrLQ3O001jVzUBbN1W8+JINFK8NFrz/hK7JgVGeHWPg6U2k7L7rukroChMA5jq974O1
HH1k/9MT0iOSZsCdMbwaaM2QMDqShxPtEOqbgUrxXFwSf1ku6GGpOrLmxLpLZ77Af2fE
1i1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=1wUFMUIpqMc53z8bMRQbMIp8JMWnDPvnVaD3d/iIdzM=;
b=IY9VPVcketQvhq6nUMnMgVnnQjOoDTzoHN4h4HIVj/DkofkH0HFTLVNdHo36MPc1Rt
mgDSbUfCmZnTRhust5tgArLZirDzTgf+PKdMW2mq2yySFIKkHkQIICJkye7qW2fY0ZYd
pP+tAwlZucKuwbiwD7WqdiDS4b4D4d5rhXQsGTR31fNnjbn0pObFM6Npbp85sueUO6Mx
05KT1qxwRt/pguFr7sdGOK/Tngp/blbbyQs+9MUE0RUCPf5EweXPZzpnq+nO9luQEHzw
L+bVENIyhI8Zzo4boHqDWPWjdQ0RkdufoxCyIC+iXAPvppTfNPhOiqZRTM7BavieA0mQ
XmnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNWIpFYawSSnYXltKq/Azxve2bB4z/wFgeqdqL3z5qV6nccBa6VLh7bno4v0xMnRtggJAjH07PgbKGWPQ==
X-Received: by 10.202.102.89 with SMTP id a86mr13835595oic.154.1474043388141;
Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.79.78 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnW9C=RY3Uy6hgx=dUX-zw3pc-LbLqv5qE5ivsYyEoe3hQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160914150428.2bc82011@pallas.home.time-travellers.org>
<CA+9kkMAXKUo-H1==pyVjo7wt6RQcs8hQjHvgk=kLPb6+DERkoQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20160916120958.1d9c0a81@pallas.home.time-travellers.org>
<CABkgnnW9C=RY3Uy6hgx=dUX-zw3pc-LbLqv5qE5ivsYyEoe3hQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:29:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMCdX13VibLN=DCEqZEJS8a=V-Fhttvk8bzDvEk_bDAF9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140f74088ace5053ca278a1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsoverhttp/mneTihIjqu0DPERGBzLgnPm6kOg>
Cc: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>, dnsoverhttp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP
X-BeenThere: dnsoverhttp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of DNS over HTTP <dnsoverhttp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsoverhttp>,
<mailto:dnsoverhttp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsoverhttp/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsoverhttp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsoverhttp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsoverhttp>,
<mailto:dnsoverhttp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 16:29:51 -0000
Howdy, On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 September 2016 at 03:09, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> > wrote: > >> GET dns:[//authority/]domain[?CLASS=class;TYPE=type] > >> > >> (See RFC 4501 for the full set of permitted syntax for DNS URIs) > >> > >> and return either application/dns or text/dns records for the result > (See > >> RFC 4027 for the specification of the MIME types). > > > > I'm not sure that I understand the syntax. Can you give some examples? > > Ted is suggesting that you could construct a URI that entirely > encapsulated a DNS request. I'm not certain that that is possible, > but it would be one way of constructing a protocol. > > For instance, a MX request might be formulated by sending a GET to > dns:IN:MX:time-traveler.org > > In the syntax of RFC 4501, this would dns:time-traveler.org?CLASS=IN;TYPE=MX > (Personally, I'm inclined to drop IN from the protocol, but that's just > me.) > It's a default in RFC 4501, so it doesn't need to be included: dns:time-traveler.org?TYPE=MX is equivalent. There are some obscure bits of the DNS protocol you can't express in the DNS URI scheme and return application/dns or text/dns, but it covers the common ground pretty simply. Ted
- [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Shane Kerr
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Patrick McManus
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP George Michaelson
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP George Michaelson
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Ted Hardie
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Shane Kerr
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Shane Kerr
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Martin Thomson
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Patrick McManus
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Martin Thomson
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Ted Hardie
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Ted Hardie
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP william manning
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP Martin Thomson
- Re: [dnsoverhttp] Survey of DNS over HTTP william manning