Re: [dnsoverhttp] HTTP/2

Alexander Mayrhofer <alex.mayrhofer.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 16 November 2017 05:58 UTC

Return-Path: <alex.mayrhofer.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsoverhttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsoverhttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B926E1294D8 for <dnsoverhttp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:58:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iH7UeACh6ZwK for <dnsoverhttp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2BEE12741D for <dnsoverhttp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id g204so6841047ywa.6 for <dnsoverhttp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:58:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1LIJCpyjv3GgbORc0YVxGbNSsAgfVM7fpBmJUlyNzv4=; b=uQuIaZr/55lJaHXgY6Rfkp/fOdn9fgMkzRQ6CcYKA7sE0OkoTzcLKN3kY7wkA3laYF ngks1CWTg6jl8X98TOYl62Z18GCxNwCKqFkePDVcYr0cvwV+soLoujvwzabxMqIq1yBU DFhEhW8CqimyMpiZMhPopPAbpmvfQ8fNH58amQCJqKc28NXc59+d02ib1GecREnpvLnH uhkYCUz6w5qSmQ0KgsEU4xVv1HF6BygF8Ee/69V36vSERSQvxJq//5dLHAfRafeg8ai6 ri44fVGHPestJcbN8sFUfCw9l4XMZgmnFXqPUIH4k3GUaZOYF2po9USaIQUdYANmlizc ReLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1LIJCpyjv3GgbORc0YVxGbNSsAgfVM7fpBmJUlyNzv4=; b=gdMliBikGUvN5JyJDwGfLDwYj+JchwdFXTPSbYtNLLz9IeS8OQF68hbnMFY/0wtFeD gccG/NL1eU7SlsmsuiBbafPThEK9S18JSoCMrZ7t7tKUOBiEZkC6Hx1JQWoR1IJTK2by bDsmz0YmZKBA02TrYWlqDgu7kmunlWNvPHI3AYyyhen37w03DuGx6dR29llyWQts/47L 5gMsdnJqQP+vJcc7f+WdvgKKgUK8ai1ENc79aZa/pXSpzAaaj3l6saGO5vclu7sI1nPu n76mXa3nMBMFm4/OxIyhdJ8gUl6SskCkNNG/iH2GuUSmckrlu2nslZsRCMiGRFb8VUxG DN3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5+8+h0PrB5rBepWQRdgnJ8Jp0tVYIveKqmhipG9Y1dEJ36i5uY LvFq8ANTxO7e2u6htxibpYKO32oOliXtnaycIxM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZsB9w1q+8oz0dK286mnzq0ZnVqzVBJBtf11ORRibr1SUuIb/bOEsZdM32znD/4Cb2U5DDpO+IHK0d+a2L5qtY=
X-Received: by 10.129.65.78 with SMTP id f14mr306680ywk.469.1510811907942; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:58:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.115.212 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:58:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <84B1B309-DA61-4CB4-9E82-350952A1F18E@mnot.net>
References: <CABkgnnXBdsYLv4dHiLH4GdvYCvDZ3JRxS6jG6Z-VvoMyfCkHLw@mail.gmail.com> <84B1B309-DA61-4CB4-9E82-350952A1F18E@mnot.net>
From: Alexander Mayrhofer <alex.mayrhofer.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:58:27 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHXf=0px7TKVfK=fbqkhkVV2_uDzO=CSt1a-EtW3LCcEwhByAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, dnsoverhttp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsoverhttp/qSIAFwDYJOBg6xCuHWPP3eNtjL0>
Subject: Re: [dnsoverhttp] HTTP/2
X-BeenThere: dnsoverhttp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of DNS over HTTP <dnsoverhttp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsoverhttp>, <mailto:dnsoverhttp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsoverhttp/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsoverhttp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsoverhttp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsoverhttp>, <mailto:dnsoverhttp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 05:58:31 -0000

Maybe an option would be to say:

"The protocol SHOULD be offered over HTTP/2, and MAY be offered over
previous versions of the HTTP protocol".. together with all the
reasoning for using HTTP/2.

best,
Alex


On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> +1. Encouraging is fine, but at the end of the day, you can't guarantee that it'll be an e2e H2 connection.
>
>
>> On 30 Oct 2017, at 12:27 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've said this elsewhere, but I don't think that mandating HTTP/2 is
>> necessary [11].
>>
>> The draft does this to pick up the security requirements of HTTP/2,
>> but that can be achieved in other ways that are less disruptive to the
>> stack.  I would prefer that we soften the requirement and encourage
>> the use of good practices - HTTP/2 certainly has many virtues that
>> make it a good choice - but not mandate a specific version.  See also
>> [56] and [7525].
>>
>> I do think that the draft needs to be more precise about server push.
>> Right now, the description of server push is rather oblique and it
>> could use some more clarity [12].
>>
>> [11] https://github.com/paulehoffman/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https/issues/11
>> [56] https://mnot.github.io/I-D/bcp56bis/#specifying-the-use-of-http
>> [7525] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7525
>> [12] https://github.com/paulehoffman/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https/issues/12
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dnsoverhttp mailing list
>> dnsoverhttp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsoverhttp
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> dnsoverhttp mailing list
> dnsoverhttp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsoverhttp