Re: [dnssd] SRP Update - removing individual services (draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-06)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 07 January 2021 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9A73A0EFA for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:07:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CbRom8OMGzLG for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C17593A1240 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id b64so5803580qkc.12 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 08:07:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=RAdM6t21oZXAHhPYX3oSrjnJyk3/HCm4vz5uH5JD++A=; b=GvYGozX14zrh3vEO01GrU2ZmGAn5I3y1pwBLpUIs1ZvLiDegDGdlfveeecrgQneFhR 20/sgw3C3Xulhzb0kMKLGqmKJQ9Su2eLXD7KuOg5KLVF6DGK/9lwga/eGkCp1BCV/xvi MBcQYolWCu9J1SOZ0oQ0WlPCUHhXC7UXBshrbfbZy878ynAGO3G2Wp23SBa4ivq5hLDn /UxWuqcuRVGPkVpwiiLFLU6Horz89yVquALqHPBOkabE7Pa6VJpAhmrDGdJKSgjEGIQn kVzNGJGZrao1JBejeKbqjokEtl4+6Omu1i/N/BUpbwCe6HVfg5eAQE5eonIsZ2R4v+79 MmMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=RAdM6t21oZXAHhPYX3oSrjnJyk3/HCm4vz5uH5JD++A=; b=BCSUFygx2Duf0usiZ8nB1eQzJVdhiQ0PsdtZ+0PN6pmHOceAR7L7pW1P53uttHKtnU am7YH2QfVCpBpaEbqRMuW163JAf4TzSDc4kaRmVgRB8ZVsWQLvX5Or98ydnySvXcxfzY 4AxNJjH3ppE6PIZFll11z9tfa1L6owLjJ+zstcBByDi4KirmJ9pVSkgFI7yp6kLvCNir ZwGiB66KfHC3PxkBSQrQQ1trbM4JP5ccxMLGTEK00J5k8+KAbUY4xKPgxkOrC7TWmBlG c/kDRiiHQEzYE0n6TKnNmj8JJB0daswn6Q3xUzpwRbcpLkAuM4ZZCbqPmZz63t77canm BJDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533gjc+tuPbbHD1E6W4A8Hcyci73BWyX/VthkbEcXf2BDIXLP3J+ NfZv1GHwpU8esUzUChHpZ3uq8g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqx5zUK2dju5zz71d5l4GMirND6zLqA8W2dUrByY1/sfgey2ps+c/CN8nPZUl0HEjcSh37Gw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:82c5:: with SMTP id e188mr9886319qkd.141.1610035650923; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 08:07:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mithrandir.lan (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y16sm3236534qki.132.2021.01.07.08.07.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Jan 2021 08:07:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <7B42EB99-8C91-4261-A1B6-6A095E149150@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_883BE186-B70B-4F5E-9E84-80344DE505FF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.2\))
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:07:29 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAGwZUDtJMRXrTq4+3EMKQM_f_m6Tv+Nmxevkdak-A3yaskbPaw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Kangping Dong <wgtdkp@google.com>, Abtin Keshavarzian <abtink@google.com>, DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>, Rongli Sun <rongli@google.com>
To: Jonathan Hui <jonhui@google.com>
References: <CACce4dTbWCVwBityepJpb5FF4Rv43+DUev_0Ka+rVT9exZrJzA@mail.gmail.com> <031C980F-D8B6-4051-8DC0-D8417FDBBD0F@fugue.com> <CACce4dQZ708aaMdvmwhEurHDSdFAvLbzwpDWz=viig_2cX75Dw@mail.gmail.com> <680A60B6-BD88-475E-91ED-48F23036A7C8@fugue.com> <CAJ5Rr7bDSMv1uPDPXppG9e4OUEU7oriK9tVKD20=P3Kgb2q=0g@mail.gmail.com> <741BC8D6-CFEF-453B-8F89-A6B102A37DAA@fugue.com> <CAJ5Rr7Yw33y2k=wo-ZXzFNP77=bucRcr2LxJxf+98e5oqK+fsw@mail.gmail.com> <6B728DF0-5EE8-4EE6-9E95-98EF4D03D865@fugue.com> <CACce4dToa2+FiYgzp5AvZjO7-UfHy5VSSZ4ED+PkHMVPBZTQAA@mail.gmail.com> <87BDE0DB-9FB0-4BB2-872D-6D045897FCBD@fugue.com> <CAJ5Rr7ZmVWRp8H1Kg2QVXFJKnrUK09J2iPHsVTDvSxFioAznUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGwZUDtJMRXrTq4+3EMKQM_f_m6Tv+Nmxevkdak-A3yaskbPaw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/-DhdZ1YxlnRsCbbBbn02vCgdbrA>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] SRP Update - removing individual services (draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-06)
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:07:33 -0000

On Dec 19, 2020, at 11:14 AM, Jonathan Hui <jonhui@google.com> wrote:
> So I guess the question is whether we can/should mandate this future going forward in SRP?

What if an LPR protocol server wants to do an SRP add?  Is there a strong reason to add this limitation? I don’t think it makes much difference.