[dnssd] Any present interest in draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-relay?

[Chris Box <[e-mail]>]

Hi everyone

The chairs are considering retiring this adopted draft, so would like to
know if any WG members are aware of plans to deploy the technology.

Last year, Ted said no clear use case, but James you indicated that mDNS
Discovery Relays might be useful to you. Did that materialise into
something, or did you go in a different direction?

Everyone else, if you have a use for Discovery Relays please tell us more.

Thanks
Chris

On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 21:21, Ted Lemon <[e-mail]> wrote:

> It expired because it turned out that this particular approach wasn't as
> necessary as it seemed when we first did the design. We've since moved more
> in the direction of the discovery proxy to solve this problem, and that
> became RFC 8766.
>
> This is not to say that the discovery relay wasn't a good idea—just that
> we don't actually have a clear use case for it that we think someone needs
> to deploy. So if you have a use case for it, that would certainly be
> interesting to discuss. But make sure discovery proxy doesn't already solve
> your problem first. :)
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 3:14 PM James Hanley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Did this expire because it was rolled into another standard?
>> -Jim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dnssd mailing list -- [e-mail]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dnssd mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>