IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnssd] WG last call on draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-01

Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Sat, 18 July 2015 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5421A1BF5 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H3I0QluPhbrb for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0779.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:779]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D86221A0378 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.25) by BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.225.13; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:22:39 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.25]) by BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.25]) with mapi id 15.01.0225.013; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:22:39 +0000
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: "dnssd@ietf.org" <dnssd@ietf.org>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Thread-Topic: WG last call on draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-01
Thread-Index: AQHQuGeHLuddF6mW6Uq1LgQt1EI5VJ3cpFUAgATnBDA=
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:22:39 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR03MB412D01C2E26F5DAC3E84BF9A3870@BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DA1638C9-346B-49A9-BA2D-8894785F43A0@cisco.com> <681D46F1-4DCA-442D-946D-AEE7D53C1F68@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <681D46F1-4DCA-442D-946D-AEE7D53C1F68@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-originating-ip: [64.134.100.3]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR03MB412; 5:SOrrbcyd7Kd6tER6fL+eHjYh/yv9IW5ct01wb22wj0JhomMD8fPFRG+Zs4xpAfGZdbsNgk21rTDqH0ZbjhacbuNyh22xl6L69CllcfLWXym1HdLgSqgaWRZAS/zfFdn4SwWcH8KjHIOpJtxVg3Y8Nw==; 24:gpkm/y0V5C6ubna+wLNeaK3V2u/5YAg9v2sIQWKX60p9rv21RcBDRi4m463WK0g6RVLU5nLhbvpQmLU5WCmTtSkKw+Jny1vYBY69slwOn3E=; 20:IcWhZyd3lXxL1FmFuWROyrXpmnJDd/Z9ZS/nvQWsgYtUljUMuxdfYRCZKHPjHLr2YLq2SvhsMi8QFHfQRc/H1Q==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB412;
by2pr03mb412: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RulesExecuted
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR03MB4123D6C844EDD8AFCE40907A3870@BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401001)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BY2PR03MB412; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR03MB412;
x-forefront-prvs: 0641678E68
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(24454002)(479174004)(13464003)(377454003)(66066001)(77156002)(62966003)(5002640100001)(40100003)(46102003)(86362001)(74316001)(2950100001)(106116001)(122556002)(77096005)(189998001)(102836002)(15975445007)(76576001)(99286002)(5003600100002)(107886002)(5001960100002)(86612001)(92566002)(33656002)(19580405001)(19580395003)(76176999)(2656002)(54356999)(230783001)(5001920100001)(2501003)(50986999)(5001770100001)(87936001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB412; H:BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Jul 2015 19:22:39.5861 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR03MB412
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/4Y7bhxKYoTuuCBdysfl3RsBv1hk>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] WG last call on draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-01
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:23:04 -0000

I read draft -01 and it looks good to me, modulo a few editorial nits:

1) First sentence of section 3 missing end parenthesis:
>   Any interoperability between DNS (including prevailing operational
>   conventions and other resolution technologies will require

I believe the end parenthesis belongs after "conventions".

2) Security Considerations:
>   This memo presents some requirements for future development, but does
>   not specify anything.  Therefore, it has no implications for security.

The second sentence does not logically follow from the first sentence.
Specifically, does this memo surface any special requirements for security? 
If not, just say there are no additional security-specific requirements.

3) Appendix A: Add note to RFC editor to remove this section before publication?

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: dnssd [mailto:dnssd-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Droms (rdroms)
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 7:29 AM
To: dnssd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnssd] WG last call on draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-01

Reminder - the WG last call for draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop is in progress and we will discuss any last call comments during the WG meeting in Prague.

- Ralph

> On Jul 6, 2015, at 11:46 PM 7/6/15, Ralph Droms (rdroms) <rdroms@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This email begins a two week WGLC on draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-01, "On Interoperation of Labels Between mDNS and DNS".
> 
> Tim and I believe the author has addressed the issues first brought forward at IETF-92 and subsequently discussed on the WG mailing list. 
> 
> You can see the draft here:
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-01.txt
> 
> Please send your comments or feedback to the list.
> 
> The WGLC ends on July 20th (Monday).
> 
> We will discuss/consider the result of the WGLC at the dnssd session at IETF-93 in Prague, which is scheduled for 9AM Wednesday, July 22.
> 
> - Ralph
> 

_______________________________________________
dnssd mailing list
dnssd@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email