[dnssd] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-23: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 21 August 2023 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B41C13737A; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 11:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnssd-srp@ietf.org, dnssd-chairs@ietf.org, dnssd@ietf.org, dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com, dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 11.8.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <169264186371.40453.10166115999002306230@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 11:17:43 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/4nJ2fJJicxSPbslswxF2jqLuPmg>
Subject: [dnssd] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-23: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 18:17:43 -0000

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-23: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnssd-srp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Joey Salazar for the SECDIR review.

Authors: Thank you for editorial style that provided introductory prose on the
protocol design before discussing the protocol itself.

Thanks for the revised text and explanations to address my earlier DISCUSS and
COMMENT feedback.

Per this earlier comment:

> ** Section 1.
>   So we can only publish information that we feel safe in publishing
>   even though we do not have any basis for trusting the requestor.
>
> What is the basis of considering particular information “safe”?

I was indeed reacting to the word "safe" as noted here:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/tjfqY9HYNsFUqJCR0VfJhHBEvsY/.  The
found the explanation in this thread illuminating and these would have been
good words to include in the document.