Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 21 January 2021 16:11 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C223A125D
for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:11:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id CKwR2JCWZBzZ for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:11:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com (mail-qt1-x829.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::829])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 595633A1261
for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:11:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id e17so1899021qto.3
for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:11:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to
:references; bh=8WPExjCNQA5HAwXW3XT7up9FhAdSdHMPCO3UpKdl76c=;
b=Ll1MamcUdyqUy7dApZKRlNrG0KIvrB6SWoIzR2L4YBVMiSTO0/Ixg+QvdYvdQ+FQW9
jL9hHq3oplCz/mFmtYy0UTEzSElXf9UUGXX9VgVd9MKwM+zV4SIv/bbrUjqAC9BmBqyL
3znL2MLjMveYCWERD4HvJ/OnNlEnjUTDnexpXimz2y9OW3r3h+cD8KwZEIXvdBgwGOY2
p5UvuxA8II4fXm1vceEcBRc4M/ElNJPacEzW3cemRQ78knff09fiPVvyhuTd0ul6CHdX
Ml1TQgSqhInOM02m28IzmYXMFDsJDrsY2zEUy9Vx1/HAyymRNMlDmcAE80jpn3Qx0Bc8
bKAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date
:in-reply-to:cc:to:references;
bh=8WPExjCNQA5HAwXW3XT7up9FhAdSdHMPCO3UpKdl76c=;
b=S3AxoJOWQS9KfJtYtV+5Yjo9X4pVRbuAz1JOnqZ4VM6oyub3CObPAmVFUm4S3fKoWP
T/aoOTCXKVmqfpFGRKpBdB3LEXZChqnUcyAiezLd2c92VKcqy42Wzc8NQtgtsR+hCwzB
WilXizRgneRLpCTZp3+kj0WH1kwiqFI9z1g3PvLVVd2x2oX4GxuKCwQHy8eDDzV6f0r8
js8drCSgX5jFq5b+I8foYKG2Gj/tb0qJp2OsP8e1Vf2+KgY1aReewFxOSnbTjtWJMp9i
ESeIjVZ5jlLUAphvbUHtAMolv33iN0GkHgWLSEO7TsCWpA1sAEqzIF1krQbv4cVs1Ojh
2cYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336NSkxVPVMSP8uvhUhG4OmPVAGgAQm2RltYkB30PDO2jDBYngA
VT7yKrmZpM69Bl6Vj61s+p/7Qw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJykXJx4dO2jJm+GMzXH6L0NHNHki0MXHuoir/1AkJaKUYS5/SRmSvKfkIWOG8NzI8EQojbCOQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4b75:: with SMTP id g21mr322982qts.334.1611245478297;
Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:11:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.4.75] (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net.
[24.91.177.160])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n30sm1347447qte.34.2021.01.21.08.11.15
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:11:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <700C359B-B9D1-4A1E-A7B2-1ACA0AF224C5@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_1E0AFB90-A36A-4534-8DB0-41636D8E8EE3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.2\))
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:11:14 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAJ5Rr7ZZ22YCCszxjXCExgDjyBN18YKZzdnCe1bTHUDhmC7qtg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>, Jonathan Hui <jonhui@google.com>,
Abtin Keshavarzian <abtink@google.com>, Yakun Xu <xyk@google.com>
To: Kangping Dong <wgtdkp@google.com>
References: <CAJ5Rr7Zc-Yma9EVXw1OeEKP+H1ZkPxB48Q5U45zoERX7=gNLJA@mail.gmail.com>
<C224E9B3-EA9F-4A49-B73C-96F3D147B1E4@fugue.com>
<CAJ5Rr7bXLiZJ=5Q-nYn2hWb2QSGzpJACv8b12BPqyTa1wJQVnA@mail.gmail.com>
<0A1488E9-BFB8-4E82-815B-EF1F2A40B35E@fugue.com>
<CAJ5Rr7ZZ22YCCszxjXCExgDjyBN18YKZzdnCe1bTHUDhmC7qtg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/5Bnmblyk86W4BcKefo2W5DYVqHg>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed
networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>,
<mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>,
<mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:11:21 -0000
On Jan 21, 2021, at 12:27 AM, Kangping Dong <wgtdkp@google.com> wrote: > Option (1) also looks good to me. But what are the RRs that should be included in the response? SRV RR for service instance name and AAAA/A RR for host name? Yes, I think that makes sense. These unambiguously indicate what type of update failed. Which brings up the question of what RRtype to use for renaming. CNAME?
- [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling Kangping Dong
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling Kangping Dong
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling Kangping Dong
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling Kangping Dong
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling Kangping Dong
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling Kangping Dong
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: Name Conflicts Handling Kangping Dong