Re: [dnssd] WG participation (or lack there of)
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 31 May 2019 20:58 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670791200FF
for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Ei0ABH7fTQF5 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 31 May 2019 13:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C69691200C1
for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id e5so2724816pls.13
for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to
:references; bh=YQ0lBIQ5OJOh9MYnU3kZ6mqxUKLYdirSDJCDQPQ6q78=;
b=cjYubnjlV1qVH/qHKcW6OJntgU3b4BrhGzvNwuVSNC9jJKt3z+yP8HTwTN6/BU9oqr
3QLE8Sz+BYvmJMPEx3n/zb5flgRo8wj7Ba4q6JxVr/Rx1pmfBJQTu0MCk6IvlFL891wV
OOc9Bb2K7B4nuVHAWkdRlrhNSWZ309az7HcJBIcxShU3V5HmXwFZpFiSdbkug8hmZtci
jT2xFHKjD4Rm7O1KwC8g2W+1DHT3F1edOXj9Qbdk1yXUXU/WFt0J+n0QXEcMGUPapAUJ
5LmlqeSZYi4x0BjXS0XnRRMk0worJXi8DWs+TKWIzHtTLOgCQrdxzF1/qndjcivEOaaK
Ff1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date
:in-reply-to:cc:to:references;
bh=YQ0lBIQ5OJOh9MYnU3kZ6mqxUKLYdirSDJCDQPQ6q78=;
b=qHPmbGwYRlsm89UMm1xMp9dla+Rx99alNxKU6ifeuSqaDTh53Itwl2CRLySMt6dJwb
UrBWz0+2vZ/Jct3trY7tzg828UGKlJxfBfHtcsMw2qPJs80GL+vge07UR2fJNzz0rd3B
0hyAAFiNegEumA7prM7PFL42dpZqILGQr9Z9tWKX242z1KLYo0hTplgKCg+55RgKvOuh
BnOauZnDuziny04Nj/CyvWO0UWAWIdETFGPE/LMSZhso7MJhcOrblbZ6T96cw8pFNwE+
1k1lx0PEZVh3ow0CNs24N0CBH4HVuGrl3MoDb8kQlBE2An04orA3JoxEAnaBdV6oppNr
GYzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWHB+SONLFRCHZv9QmbuLrH+ff5X1ZVuJuW4hFkIBw7HJX+BAq8
Hz+8IWgSyaQNNTRXMx4KXol8Q8k6xGg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwGjZNAUMZpUlGKCtLE9toEoNgg61c29BCTHD7FQJDxLXOQd9A6wsOb0W/TTNC0Jn3vebPuyw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a582:: with SMTP id
az2mr11829270plb.110.1559336298583;
Fri, 31 May 2019 13:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [17.230.172.14] ([17.230.172.14])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm5469922pgi.86.2019.05.31.13.58.16
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Fri, 31 May 2019 13:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <537B0D8C-9943-448E-9972-D3717E03878B@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_E66A3AF5-3825-41F8-B5D5-73F1811EC443"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 13:58:04 -0700
In-Reply-To: <3FE4C383-658F-49A9-B5E9-5E1AE68C6255@bangj.com>
Cc: DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>
To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
References: <1E8281A3-50CD-4526-86D2-A65B4A6C27CF@bangj.com>
<1CC8AB7F-7AFE-4883-9751-0BC6CA0BDCA9@fugue.com>
<3FE4C383-658F-49A9-B5E9-5E1AE68C6255@bangj.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/5GEIZJwIUpWnx0mRsb29Jz2prj4>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] WG participation (or lack there of)
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed
networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>,
<mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>,
<mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 20:58:21 -0000
On May 31, 2019, at 1:31 PM, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> wrote: > Well, I was hoping you and Stuart objected. But it’s everyone else that worries me. Where are the users, vendors, implementors aside from the authors? As I said, I will have time to discuss it after the WWDC crunch is over. If it’s okay with you, can we hold off until then?
- [dnssd] WG participation (or lack there of) Tom Pusateri
- Re: [dnssd] WG participation (or lack there of) Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] WG participation (or lack there of) Tom Pusateri
- Re: [dnssd] WG participation (or lack there of) Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] WG participation (or lack there of) Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnssd] WG participation (or lack there of) Ted Lemon
- [dnssd] WWDC / Bonjour Privacy Daniel KAISER
- Re: [dnssd] WWDC / Bonjour Privacy Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] WWDC / Bonjour Privacy Daniel KAISER
- Re: [dnssd] WWDC / Bonjour Privacy Ted Lemon