IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnssd] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sctl-service-registration-02.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 17 July 2018 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06935130DE2 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7f513bCTDD0Z for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8380712785F for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id s7-v6so934458itb.4 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yaYwJkunJyrNzCeSotR2urqvDzQ4NEn0ytckaG7zqSI=; b=Hs/5vC3Jc23VBzSloj84x5Y09egxQuw69GsRaa+Sqia94zo/bNvikySLRReQi3KiiC tB121vGoimnWzDfi3bvDNcd4YPTXUBnsZDSTV7LRHbDI3ZaREBliqnRelilbG+fV9OV5 KWiazYFAUcvJLk/E9y+I5CAQ3iaGWCCa2ixLkm91kBrwnzjjYbrrqirmhGkLrYtqwWd6 PUj8NQ+/zVbf5Bsre/Mkazof9wsv7hjxjku/+gq3e/dEG9MaZOqLKWyHFIzt+JLK36k/ xBXsVq3WngxpfmsZRc+CUJb3gI9OgziEAivItfq7xDGN1kGr9fTw+uhSqfsJx3t/OGau rvbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yaYwJkunJyrNzCeSotR2urqvDzQ4NEn0ytckaG7zqSI=; b=Tx6nzaoyDhl6iKnF3420WIfyFjj8y6bQjr0SrUwNAj5LdnpXAbEp5NhVtYKs/l1fN4 UR6sSyQ2W9rQr2pL3eAn4a71DXj1W+BG3g1VUBVNOt5cT7FLdLOttO6B7ie0bv1e/MLV 00UFFHdfanTOpOPvEsRTiWDVlMiQgDj3Qn/kKjDYsbICb6OqBZFxiC1MS6BUtWmgd5bM 7xHn7oo0TYKwE9/fAltyjahG3ilwKGbBGEvoVkQ30Hr6q7sBnNdjbOYMCgOOMr/LUqRh fAZrwYZNi7YQQG3LYvaI/8A5Q7NOU6csCFzKXqptCy/YcKkOkTYooNIH/U4i69RhluCb 4Bag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGhUm7MnFKrzM1G3j87J7nuQHm8T7u/Jjw2dxeUsJRDfpK/c8+c aFGwH3+mA19YkfcXoAFyY2xF8RqLijnvrAoQ2V9wjO3l
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeIm2dU8RZ9J8YryW0LW1+MPwbJBd48+IsIUUzs5a2p1QvxMZYhD7bDqPPpRaUwrFTWZqYxtJweBbVLly1Sibo=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:d485:: with SMTP id x127-v6mr2965792itg.82.1531858404864; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:5f86:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1mrr=od-HBEDoS+Bs7fHuHj1Kc0HU-+6+NvhCyWDywYLg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <153168722035.21892.2695151923270049902.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAPt1N1mYtPRxP6F-JwKbWey3r_vSaNP5srbkf314gdjfdNe8mw@mail.gmail.com> <87d0vn7b5t.fsf@toke.dk> <CALX6+rAjz2FtsQkhNyp=xYjXovUJUMN5Bg5iRHSWzMTJaZtCjg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1kODz72aHwF0z-uhYo4tojwsLEQJwLyzP8zeUYXduFkyQ@mail.gmail.com> <87a7qq6fdk.fsf@toke.dk> <CAPt1N1k59CM8WG4HoqXkG-crUEJbk+KNppX_pgkVFdwbSxNDpw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1khnMaRE2oe5WEQmonB8AJcLeBm=OB=i1trbEuc=XiL5Q@mail.gmail.com> <B88554CD-2117-44CC-ACA0-F5ACB3F48F88@bangj.com> <CAPt1N1=42Wum5x0s4dJZUB1t2i7g-UUJwcmWKQV5HMM5mAYyQQ@mail.gmail.com> <0542F0E1-88BB-4EF5-9897-CB608E5792C9@bangj.com> <CAPt1N1mrr=od-HBEDoS+Bs7fHuHj1Kc0HU-+6+NvhCyWDywYLg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 16:12:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1nFj5DpkRepLQ=Jmk=Spx87tNcfUMGyJRuAT=26givYKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
Cc: dnssd <dnssd@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000118d3f0571379453"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/5V6cOP1oUou-DAnJdmV7KzS45Tw>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sctl-service-registration-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:13:30 -0000

Tim pointed out that we need to protect the Service Instance Name as well
as the Host Description with a KEY record, because FCFS naming has to
protect both the service description and the host description.   Here are
the changes:

https://github.com/StuartCheshire/draft-sctl-service-registration/compare/ae53618d8231733701ccdda4d336692a529c9f6b...5c85181881b84ed1132d544e157df8da85874597

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 6:42 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> The question of whether we update RFC6763 is basically "is there text that
> is in RFC6763 that is no longer correct because of this document."  I think
> the answer is no.
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok, just checking. So given that 6763 semi-defines service registration
>> protocol as DNS Dynamic Update, should this document claim it updates 6763?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
>>
>> On Jul 16, 2018, at 6:01 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>>
>> The title of RFC 6763 is DNS-Based Service Discovery.   So I tried to
>> harmonize the document toward that—did I miss something?
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> wrote:
>>
>>> How is DNS-Based Service Discovery different from DNS Service Discovery?
>>>
>>> Is this meant to distinguish from RFC 6763?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> On Jul 16, 2018, at 5:46 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW, the current version of the document on github now includes fixes
>>> for all the points that have been raised other than the ones I said I
>>> wasn't going to fix: https://github.com/Stuart
>>> Cheshire/draft-sctl-service-registration
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 5:29 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why can't it be just a Host Description? Might be useful for a device
>>>>> that just wants to register its name but doesn't (currently, or ever)
>>>>> advertise any services...
>>>>>
>>>>> Good question.   What does the working group think?   :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dnssd mailing list
>>> dnssd@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dnssd mailing list
>> dnssd@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd
>>
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email