IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnssd] Further IPR disclosures on draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-05 ?

Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> Thu, 12 March 2015 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E45E31A0174; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FA21A00B0; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D864SrYbKeHJ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 554471A00F3; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-f790b6d000004359-e3-5501308347d4
Received: from EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.75]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 9A.07.17241.38031055; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:21:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.124]) by EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:16:57 -0400
From: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Further IPR disclosures on draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-05 ?
Thread-Index: AQHQXMUYANusZjHzlUicO0bQ0Vcq4J0Y07OA
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:16:56 +0000
Message-ID: <2DD56D786E600F45AC6BDE7DA4E8A8C15D8C0D@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
References: <20150312020708.27620.27985.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <64537593-69EF-43FA-8660-58812A265EFB@nominum.com> <A494098B-8360-4B79-BEDC-657A8B72F91C@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|4e17462205535732b1efd4c738f85d5cr2BD4J03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|A494098B-8360-4B79-BEDC-657A8B72F91C@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|4e17462205535732b1efd4c738f85d5cr2BD4J03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|A494098B-8360-4B79-BEDC-657A8B72F91C@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2DD56D786E600F45AC6BDE7DA4E8A8C15D8C0Deusaamb107ericsso_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpjkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZXLrHW7fZgDHUYM45RYsr7/qYLXrOT2Ky 2Noda3Foz3M2BxaPv+tcPZYs+cnk8frAfNYA5igum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujBkX+9gLdiRV7F9/ jbWB8UF8FyMHh4SAicTrazJdjJxAppjEhXvr2UBsIYEjjBIPLiR0MXIB2csZJQ5+72EBSbAJ GEm0HepnB0mICDQxSry6Mgesg1kgQmLmgj9MILawgJdE+/eDYHERAW+JmQ83Q9lGEh+ebGcG sVkEVCWuHu0Ai/MC1Rw68pQdYtsqJomlL8+ygDicAq2MEr/PfQLrYAS67/upNUwQ28Qlbj2Z zwRxt4DEkj3nmSFsUYmXj/+xQthKEpOWnmOFqM+XOHTvPBPENkGJkzOfsExgFJ2FZNQsJGWz kJTNAoYSs4CmxPpd+hAlihJTuh+yQ9gaEq1z5rIjiy9gZF/FyFFanFqWm25kuIkRGHHHJNgc dzAu+GR5iFGAg1GJh/fDCYZQIdbEsuLK3EOM0hwsSuK8ZVcOhggJpCeWpGanphakFsUXleak Fh9iZOLglGpgrO9f+HldxexjAXf85EsUmA6Xn1nTsU34kYpSwalrrHH8W73OMbc7dUbb61hu EljudtOtkn2C2X4ru+X553P5z19gKgnWuyF5lauwY39P2/nVi4KLvPdoFxQ1Moodasr/LbDN Ksb3h+OtMqVrKZtvRrYX7n17Zo/r3hvzj/3rVfPfsv91mPw8JZbijERDLeai4kQAn89UhpkC AAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/7S0Fd8qaCQNPhoqeobIayX2D7KY>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:59:03 -0700
Cc: "dnssd-chairs@ietf.org" <dnssd-chairs@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] Further IPR disclosures on draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-05 ?
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:20:52 -0000

Hi,

I am not aware of any additional IPR.

BR
Daniel

From: Tim Chown [mailto:tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 9:04 AM
To: draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@ietf.org
Cc: dnssd-chairs@ietf.org; Ted Lemon
Subject: Further IPR disclosures on draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-05 ?

Kerry, Stuart, Marc, Daniel,

Please can you confirm whether there is any additional IPR on the requirements draft as per Ted’s request below?

As per my other email just now, I understood that the IPR statement on the requirements draft (i.e.  https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2114/) had intended to be on the hybrid solution draft (i.e. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2119/ ).

Apologies for this extra late (hopefully small) hurdle.

Thanks,
Tim


On 12 Mar 2015, at 02:19, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com<mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>> wrote:

On Mar 11, 2015, at 10:07 PM, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com<mailto:presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>> wrote:

 The draft includes the boilerplate confirming that the document "is
 submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP
 79". No disclosures have been made, nor are expected to be made in an
 Informational requirements draft.

Argh, sorry, I didn't catch that.   Tim, please ask the authors to say explicitly whether they are aware of any additional IPR.   The boilerplate isn't adequate, because it is added by a tool, and is not present in the XML source.


There was an IPR disclosure made on the earlier pre-WG version of this
document back in 2013. Were the authors asked whether that disclosure
also applies to this version of the document? Is the WG aware of this
disclosure? Did the WG discuss the disclosure? Were any concerns raised?

Hm.   This has certainly come up in meetings.   I think the only time it was mentioned on the mailing list was prior to the BoF that produced dnssd.   The disclosure has been in the tracker all along.   Are you suggesting that the working group may have agreed to advance the document without being aware of this, despite the IPR having been present in the tracker?

_______________________________________________
dnssd mailing list
dnssd@ietf.org<mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email