IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dnssd] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Mon, 07 July 2025 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnssd@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnssd@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB1B408DE1B for <dnssd@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 13:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=portfast.net
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FGKLWCq0OBmU for <dnssd@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 13:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.portfast.net (mail.portfast.net [IPv6:2a03:9800:20:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55A7B408DBF9 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 13:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=portfast.net; s=dkim; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: From:Cc:References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rPR+TWmMUNxUTRge8A0PeHtQnD60u5UgNtSGafJnA0s=; b=coeJZP2KsnHDWC31eciLWBfBij cgvuvEdwB6ZejtgskvVCWHry3VdRr7/unOloM8oWm5Bdz6ora7Xyp8e0s4oZL/WhOEiddwHWNQKTf WBEbCZGqEz+ahz8I7YTsZdvOHVzJPvOPMaP1dq2/dTU2kHkJJMl1A75s/3UVK6NI5I1g=;
Received: from [2a10:8702:d:5400:35db:d902:9190:5fef] (port=61160) by mail.portfast.net ([2a03:9800:20:1::2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128) id 1uYsZx-0085JA-07 (Exim 4.96) (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Mon, 07 Jul 2025 21:36:45 +0100
Message-ID: <d5651a53-14ff-496e-bb26-c4aae138c1a8@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 21:36:43 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Florian Obser <florian+ietf@narrans.de>
References: <87frgk46zp.fsf@x395.home.narrans.de> <m1zfdfvqq2.fsf@narrans.de>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
In-Reply-To: <m1zfdfvqq2.fsf@narrans.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: A3R5HOP7NQBT4525UBRBBB2DMRBD7D5N
X-Message-ID-Hash: A3R5HOP7NQBT4525UBRBBB2DMRBD7D5N
X-MailFrom: ray@bellis.me.uk
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnssd.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dnssd <dnssd@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [dnssd] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/7pjP8d0tB1UjiSitM8l30B1rz7o>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnssd-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnssd-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnssd-leave@ietf.org>


On 2025/07/07 18:46, Florian Obser wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> the WGLC is now closed, apologies for closing it late[1].
> 
> The chairs see consensus that the document can progress.
> 
> The chairs also see consensus that the two issues raised by Tommy Jensen
> in
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/bQkA2274kKrzNcpFRlLoQif2u1M/
> need to be addressed:

I've addressed the second.   I don't think the first needs to be 
explicitly addressed (see my explanation to the list from this morning) 
unless someone can suggest sensible text before tonight's cutoff.

Also noting that it's perfectly reasonable to cache unsolicited RRs if 
they're validly DNSSEC signed.

Ray

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status