Re: [dnssd] [core] Report on first Resource Directory plugtest

[peter van der Stok <[e-mail]>]

Hi Christian,

thanks for this very useful work
Some questions/ remarks below.


> * Only little unclear parts in the current RD draft
> 
>   * May a con= argument be present in a simple registration? (Probably
>     not, though this precludes simple registration over TCP).
certainly not; it beats the purpose.
We may add text in RD to address the TCP part.
> 
>   * Can there be a Location-Query option in a registration response?
>     (Probably not, we just didn't say that.)
to what purpose?
> 
>   * Can a con= have query parameters? (Certainly not intended, it just
>     didn't even occur to anyone before.)
It states explicitly that it is a scheme//authority string, no query 
parameters possible;
The simplicity helps to specify an already complex subject
> 
>   Those parts are being fed into the process of refining the
>   resource-directory document, in parallel to the other input we've 
> been
>   receiving.

to be filled into the github, I hope.
>