IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnssd] WG participation (or lack there of)

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Fri, 31 May 2019 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070281200FF for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8MoGjQWkOnBJ for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48E651200C1 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.25.146] (69-77-155-155.static.skybest.com [69.77.155.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D53231081; Fri, 31 May 2019 16:31:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
Message-Id: <3FE4C383-658F-49A9-B5E9-5E1AE68C6255@bangj.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6414F422-5C5C-44F6-9B8A-D000FAEB1995"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 16:31:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1CC8AB7F-7AFE-4883-9751-0BC6CA0BDCA9@fugue.com>
Cc: DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
References: <1E8281A3-50CD-4526-86D2-A65B4A6C27CF@bangj.com> <1CC8AB7F-7AFE-4883-9751-0BC6CA0BDCA9@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/E8_95O61Ts5Sz4mnXXbep1XKP1Q>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] WG participation (or lack there of)
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 20:31:48 -0000

> On May 31, 2019, at 4:07 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> On May 30, 2019, at 8:12 AM, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com <mailto:pusateri@bangj.com>> wrote:
>> If you object to the WG shutting down, then respond as such and include how you’re willing to contribute in the next few months. 
> 
> 
> I do object.   I’m a bit jammed up with pre-WWDC work right now to comment at length, but will respond in more detail after WWDC.
> 

Well, I was hoping you and Stuart objected. But it’s everyone else that worries me. Where are the users, vendors, implementors aside from the authors?

Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email