Re: [dnssd] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnssd-push-10 (extended to 14th April)

Ralph Droms <> Fri, 14 April 2017 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F1112953D for <>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7YiYodD-4L-s for <>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6853126DDF for <>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id f133so73036892qke.2 for <>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=U091zL23mrPNA5MfcywGu6jeKYC/BR6yfTm1yrjGdsQ=; b=KA9WJI8iqb5NlhzoOJVKZVTndxNqirfjwd6poIAYIpWKyz8WEF4E1oARe3QMaZNbKg 1e1Al5pDRGg7aGDAzX4Hp+VzwGvUUBvAtcXrsFnzGEE0gTCJWUP+RQnXczQdlehw83CN 7ZbIfLHstBVI+VkEjH6en3V/qnnhPIIW/DEzH1fvLrMIQRy0DFUQPtwKy5R+DcCcecap c3PvjeIecOxQfuufux/eSaOdxirjOK0/T5vkRMklgNi/JlOVhgOoFAhRq4sE7m4FYrzP 3Y3xs4IF8hDqymt+Q5mXsEb055nDeXoD7rL+kyhTAsV7V8T9UtJmTSiUjMVwQjNmc8Kl EqKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=U091zL23mrPNA5MfcywGu6jeKYC/BR6yfTm1yrjGdsQ=; b=X0J/gNH8wLMfpJeFx0c2SveqrKjta1FvpIxev3noAt2QkAlsMOfx+sAVV5hrDkuaQU gjgvCN1HRFeD5S6BhxNpCADNssmB2LfOvt2qAQWrijP0i5fCCdOum7KxRCH6JCrfEKci z9aTx9BQ/+IZRNK4IUAn9CmN2SgjTRQfxidbnhMEtKFIHGM/RW/MCXhrcIg70JZWBDWn gfH2WolvilKOM5ekMOSc4F4vuRUeZ8XnbwdMd8AGUOynQHjqHSZcXKSrlYqt748wfmfm 3ObwS5MxK1r3QKn+/tmPVrcLsC850Lbx3WUys9rM6FWHDQRe5PGbkibYSEd7oKRcVrP9 imag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4UNJc0IKMKfHOZ+XixH+KqYUqHmV5DagMS4NVYSjzxNnaaGSqH ahetTsNvIzji5/P3/kg=
X-Received: by with SMTP id p75mr9034720qkp.240.1492196651797; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18f:801:600:c83f:b1ca:ba4c:6d04? ([2601:18f:801:600:c83f:b1ca:ba4c:6d04]) by with ESMTPSA id m130sm1732811qke.66.2017. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ralph Droms <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:04:08 -0400
Cc: "" <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <> <>
To: Sara Dickinson <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnssd-push-10 (extended to 14th April)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 19:04:15 -0000

Thanks for your review, Sara.

Everyone - we have still received only minimal response to the WG last call, and we really need more support for consensus to progress the draft to the IESG.  Please review the document and respond to the mailing list - even a simple "I've read the draft and it's ready to go to the IESG" is helpful.

- Ralph

> On Apr 14, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Sara Dickinson <> wrote:
> HI All, 
> This draft looks in very good shape to me. I have a couple of minor comments:
> - I think there could be a reference to RFC7858 at the end of the second paragraph in Section 4.
> - Section 6.4.1 discusses clients having 2 messages in flight with the same MESSAGE ID (SUBSCRIBE and UNSUBSCRIBE). This is a valid use case in this context but it does conflict with the statement in RFC7766 “When sending multiple queries over a TCP connection, clients MUST NOT reuse the DNS Message ID of an in-flight query on that connection in order to avoid Message ID collisions. “. I think it would be helpful to point out this exception and in fact I think that means this draft technically updates RFC7766?
> - Section 7 - I think it would help if there was a reference to draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles - the discussion of server authentication here overlaps with that draft. Also a reference to  section 9 of draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles could be used instead of sections 7.3 and 7.4 as that document already makes recommendations about following RFC7525, TLS Session resumption and similar. 
> Sara. 
>> On 6 Apr 2017, at 09:59, Tim Chown <> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We have had no comments on this WGLC.
>> In order to progress the draft to our AD/IESG we need some positive expressions of support; please do try to find some time to read and comment on the document.
>> We’ll extend the WGLC until next Friday, 14th April, given we are also waiting on a WGLC for the DNS session signalling draft used by DNS Push.
>> Many thanks,
>> Tim & Ralph
>>> On 21 Mar 2017, at 11:24, Tim Chown <> wrote:
>>> Dear dnssd WG participants,
>>> We are initiating a WG Last Call today on draft-ietf-dnssd-push-10, which you can find at
>>> The call runs for two weeks, and will thus close on Tuesday 4th April.
>>> Please send any comments, which includes indications of support for progression of the document as is, to the list.  Such statements of support are important; this draft will not be advanced for publication unless there is sufficient response and support from the WG.  
>>> There will be a brief opportunity to also make comments in the dnssd WG meeting in Chicago next week, but the chairs would appreciate a record of comments to the list.
>>> We are expecting the associated DNS session signalling draft to also go through WGLC in the dnsop WG in the next couple of weeks, with the aim of both documents being published together.
>>> The DNS-SD Discovery Proxy (formerly the DNS-SD Hybrid Proxy), which Stuart has updated to reflect the new nomenclature, will be sent to the IESG once the shepherd write-up is completed.
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Ralph and Tim
>>> dnssd WG co-chairs
>> _______________________________________________
>> dnssd mailing list
> _______________________________________________
> dnssd mailing list