Re: [dnssd] WG participation (or lack there of)

Ted Lemon <> Fri, 07 June 2019 23:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B78120161 for <>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9KtiFTa-pCaD for <>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::733]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 074E512002E for <>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id t64so2313747qkh.1 for <>; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 16:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=QfH+H7rsIEF0357FclihJJv5KfyDq5dMIW56Vw+5xNM=; b=LWE7r3somY8hD10vI3nZ4oPEZdQmRTgutf98dyrm24qwuBJ3084GoRGCmRda7hiM6L r0yllNitYgTStPihSCctfy8Ly+l/borhJ0s9aXfYBEiEwllCcyUqYC2mTj/c9Wok7GM4 W/iUtu+T+2T75xFuLhZWffAoB5ZqDUDWihzWkht+1wQFxIjaq92RMaaWlGSdcDpXvKh9 x3mjSGA+ZcX/KBLFU41EWAhgTdQWHQp6mm/JzKuGJ/JGioaQuuSZ8fwc0HABY5k5ExXt w8rUQDRP58kdtePrVdUrdvnoytvyCrQy8N3Qn0V3x5y5Mirb0sJM/CHDclSxEyIr5kyC /jNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=QfH+H7rsIEF0357FclihJJv5KfyDq5dMIW56Vw+5xNM=; b=Lx6TiHGB9sQnDOBUwjQgR+dETiF8CTR+xBBF0ZsXr9Sf7QqelRRt8tA/8Rui1tgR9o 7DwdiGodsrQh8bpoSzDaIMPEXP7Mbu0Lyvoi8jfGnsaIeKYm7Q05C3HzBsm97/wCrqMG qd6K7dyzhrADy2oMGGVszRjbVGSgf4cz3kyyyq5vRAbp2aFWwlgvRQFpeHrxwWHUmAhP CzwTd3Iyc0SGU7NQ1z2dJ6vPHMlEFoW7ga0RlR6ySxGwwO/nyns9zhvBboDlVgsEvBi8 Mbb9lbb506gkLsvITi8JYw9iEaeS0BDmDGOC+VKKLVs4aZEB/StXCBGgUnvx9s3OjbWa 68xQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX+cl60Ceiz+xbjBQcZKRtCxwHGcFob7CrwUEsH7WlLAJfbywj8 0qKKK/Vu6uixo4zGzlfci4CAl6Kn7s4dBQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxfOIiTYRsvxP1ABdqoIelRpbf3vRC7zoK5+HEDxFUpvrUzPfaLBMfyi5Vccrzt9WpZyQy+bw==
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:f503:: with SMTP id o3mr11598351qkg.345.1559949082881; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 16:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPSA id j66sm451560qkf.86.2019. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Jun 2019 16:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <>
Message-Id: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_08ED36AB-7931-4B9B-8570-9F36F06D7825"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 19:11:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <>
Cc: Tom Pusateri <>, DNSSD <>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <>
References: <> <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] WG participation (or lack there of)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 23:11:26 -0000

On May 31, 2019, at 8:33 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson <> wrote:
> I think you are right and with only 2 people interested in the work it is time to close the WG 

It is a concern to me that the number of people who are interested in this and paying attention to the mailing list and replying seems low, but at the same time work is going on to deploy our work in the industry.   All of the major O.S. vendors support it.   One option would be to go forward with the remaining work as ISE documents, with the potential that the IETF might want to update them later.

I would be curious to know your opinion on this: do you feel that you would rather that this stuff not be documented, or are you concerned that there aren’t enough people here doing review?