[dnssd] Adoption call for draft-sekar-dns-ul-03 into DNSSD

[Chris Box <[e-mail]>]

WG members,

This email starts a call to adopt
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sekar-dns-ul-03 into the DNSSD
working group.

What is this? Abstract:
   This document proposes a new EDNS0 option that can be used by DNS
   Update clients and DNS servers to include a lease lifetime in a DNS
   Update or response, allowing a server to garbage collect stale
   resource records that have been added by DNS Updates

Adoption means that formal change control passes from the authors to the
working group. All subsequent substantive changes require WG rough
consensus. Adoption represents a commitment that the DNSSD WG will spend
time on the draft, with the aim of progressing it towards publication.

Note that in theory the draft could fit the charters of both DNSOP and
DNSSD, but we're proposing DNSSD as this specific functionality is required
as part of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnssd-srp/> which is already
well advanced. The relevant charter text is:

2. To develop an improved, scalable solution for service discovery
   that can operate in multi-link networks, where devices may be
   in neighboring or non-neighboring links, applicable to
   the scenarios above.  The solution will consider tradeoffs between
   reusing/extending existing protocols and developing entirely new
   protocols.

This email is being copied to DNSOP to solicit additional feedback from the
expertise there, but note this is NOT a call to adopt into DNSOP.

You should be aware this draft is covered by an IPR disclosure. Details of
Apple's licensing terms can be found at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1236/.

Within DNSSD we are asking two questions:
1) If you have read this six-page draft and are content with it, or would
like to amend/discuss it further inside the working group, please speak up
now.
2) If you believe that this document is not something the DNSSD working
group should be working on, please also say so.

For this call to succeed, we'll need statements of explicit support from
people who have read the draft. The document does not have to be perfect,
but it needs to be solving a problem the WG wants to solve in a way
approximately as described in the draft.

Please send statements in support or against, as responses to this email.
This call will be open until 2021-09-03 23:59 UTC.

Thanks,
Chris