Re: [dnssd] dnssd privacy draft

Alf Watt <alf@istumbler.net> Mon, 27 June 2016 04:18 UTC

Return-Path: <alf@istumbler.net>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2766612D536 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 21:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cm4pdydqi3Oo for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 21:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aibo.runbox.com (aibo.runbox.com [91.220.196.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C2E212D0BF for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 21:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <alf@istumbler.net>) id 1bHNzt-0006MK-Mj; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 06:18:09 +0200
Received: from c-24-5-43-153.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.5.43.153] helo=[192.168.29.198]) by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:871115 ) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1bHNzl-0001GK-J4; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 06:18:01 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alf Watt <alf@istumbler.net>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXrEW8tDvOzzyMPZT0KrUDvTX2MdNB7w5712ZbPNNOcUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 21:17:58 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1674621C-3632-4F32-8552-8625D0BCE1DE@istumbler.net>
References: <CABkgnnU68Rwsy7Hn5jwCP7ytXh3MmGw_h4a_E8hjri0X_P3kWw@mail.gmail.com> <04a901d1ce4e$52e056e0$f8a104a0$@huitema.net> <CABkgnnXrEW8tDvOzzyMPZT0KrUDvTX2MdNB7w5712ZbPNNOcUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/U6MG6gooKXKRhRDQ9Ysd3Z6qR_8>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>, dnssd@ietf.org, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] dnssd privacy draft
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 04:18:25 -0000

Opportunistic Encryption using the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) might be suitable for the purposes proposed here.

 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4322

Best,
Alf

> On Jun 26, 2016, at 5:32 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 25 June 2016 at 05:26, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> wrote:
>> Yes. The point is, do we have the appetite to design a pairing protocol in
>> this group? If we do, my preference would be to describe this pairing
>> protocol in a separate draft.
> 
> Sounds like hard work :)  Might be worth doing though.