Re: [dnssd] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04

[Christian Huitema <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the review, Robert. We will fix the nits in the next revision.

-- Christian Huitema

On 2/7/2020 7:51 AM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review result: Ready
>
> This is a combined genart and secdir last-call review.
> Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review Date: 2020-02-07
> IETF LC End Date: 2020-02-12
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
> Summary: Ready (but with nits) for publication as an Informational RFC
>
> This document provides a set of high-level requirements for a DNS-SD
> privacy exptension, and discussion motivating those requirements.
>
> Comment:
> It might be good to call out in the discussion that while it is intended
> to be thorough, it's not possible to be exhaustive.
>
> Nits (editorial, in document order):
>
> The last sentence of the first paragraph of the introduction is complex.
> Consider breaking it apart.
>
> In the introduction at "When analyzing these scenarios in Section 3.2",
> did you mean Section 3.1?
>
> In the first sentence of 3.2 at "the scenarios in Section 2", did you
> mean Section 3.1?
>
> At the first sentence in 3.4.4, at "online" did you mean "on-link"?
>
> The statement in the second paragraph of section 4 is perhaps too strong.
> Consider changing "will lead" to "are intended to lead".
>
> The item numbering in sections 4.1 and 4.2 are messsed up.
>
> The intent of the next to last paragraph in 4.1 and the last paragraph in 4.2
> could be made more clear. I suggest something like: "When listing and resolving
> services in current DNS-SD deployments".
>
>
>