Re: [dnssd] When does MDNS/DNS-SD use IPv6?

Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Thu, 19 January 2017 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <hagen@jauu.net>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5C41293EE for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 02:24:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.377, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, MISSING_MIMEOLE=1.899, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J_6FZvExQZEu for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 02:24:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.mailbox.org (mx1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01023128B37 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 02:24:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06ECF45626; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:24:23 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de
Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by gerste.heinlein-support.de (gerste.heinlein-support.de [91.198.250.173]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id pZIYXfXpKZYE; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:24:14 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:24:13 +0100
Message-ID: <b9abb80f-1e6e-4618-805d-4329272ec800@email.android.com>
X-Android-Message-ID: <b9abb80f-1e6e-4618-805d-4329272ec800@email.android.com>
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
To: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/WeUDZUb3PLRe_hQmsayEJfDkayc>
Cc: "cheshire@apple com" <cheshire@apple.com>, dnssd@ietf.org, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] When does MDNS/DNS-SD use IPv6?
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 10:24:27 -0000



Am 19.01.2017 09:29 schrieb Erik Kline <ek@google.com>om>:



On networks with even moderate numbers of hosts it can be quite a lot
of traffic.  This is frequently a concern for battery impact (to those
devices that are primarily battery powered).  (We see bug reports
about this stuff.


Ack, from a power consumption point of view it is beneficial if the time span between both transmitted packets are as short as possible to wake the CPU one time and not two. So reducing C state transitions into C0 and friends.