Re: [dnssd] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnssd-push

"Jan Komissar (jkomissa)" <jkomissa@cisco.com> Mon, 29 April 2019 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jkomissa@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D841201BE for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=SSiRImKl; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=GfyNzFPP
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5xcSyCJ2Vh6C for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FAFC120162 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13397; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1556552331; x=1557761931; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=lyTouNkvFLKyjTFUH7u9GVmk5T4dQK9KRnfKcTctslw=; b=SSiRImKlYJreDzUELJ1hnF4ZkkE2flY6CItz/ouxwj0VEiRcKOm52feF /M9xpD2JPB78PMpTO5P20Td91+W38SJJgOW48o8ab99+EN22jcR85gmPh cZeXhHJRvNMOnuM9nFA/0RQZqsPTSMypbVzkDZiICFBpPh6xj9ojQq+Xv U=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3ATpoudRMWOIEgpI07kNQl6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65?= =?us-ascii?q?Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEu6w/l0fHCIPc7f8My/HbtaztQyQh2d6AqzhDFf4ETB?= =?us-ascii?q?oZkYMTlg0kDtSCDBj5L/nvbjchFexJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AGAABVGcdc/5tdJa1mGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgQ4vUANoVSAECygKhAaDRwOEUoo7gjI?= =?us-ascii?q?liT6JGIRMgS4UgRADVA4BARgBDAiDCYE3AheGGyM0CQ4BAwEBBAEBAgECbRw?= =?us-ascii?q?MhUoBAQEDAQEBEBEdAQEsCwEECwIBCA4DAwECKAMCAgIfBgsUCQgCBAENBSK?= =?us-ascii?q?DAAGBHUwDDQ8BDqJ2AoE1iF9xgS+CeQEBBYE2AoEPgjUNC4IOAwaBMgGLSRe?= =?us-ascii?q?BQD+BEScME4JMPoIaRwEBAgEXgRAEARIBPw0JglQygiaNPIREh3eMSzkJAoI?= =?us-ascii?q?JhhGDb4Rmg00bgg2GNIxmizYJToEehSOBSIxEAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFPOGVxcBU?= =?us-ascii?q?7KgGCQYFrJINvhRSFP3IBgSiQPw8XgQsBgSABAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,409,1549929600"; d="scan'208,217";a="268832618"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 29 Apr 2019 15:38:50 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (xch-rcd-017.cisco.com [173.37.102.27]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x3TFcoqk020566 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 15:38:50 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (173.37.102.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:38:49 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:38:49 -0500
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:38:49 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=lyTouNkvFLKyjTFUH7u9GVmk5T4dQK9KRnfKcTctslw=; b=GfyNzFPPoN21ev1P2OR3VZZtzTLaRiAUEEHVrKCTulIgi5duoQZ7baqbGLmGrwP+qAqNkl9KZ9esDGOg4mku1hPmKKJwEuZAJNPclAM1LtNEtbNBpFXAetQvL78DbZXRda6qR0yrHcSWdHD4BQliODMfe0bjGV6pdfLzoSSn68w=
Received: from BY5PR11MB4037.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.161.210) by BY5PR11MB4021.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.161.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1835.14; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 15:38:48 +0000
Received: from BY5PR11MB4037.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::608b:c4db:ca21:b0ae]) by BY5PR11MB4037.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::608b:c4db:ca21:b0ae%4]) with mapi id 15.20.1835.016; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 15:38:48 +0000
From: "Jan Komissar (jkomissa)" <jkomissa@cisco.com>
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>, Stuart Cheshire <cheshire=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dnssd] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnssd-push
Thread-Index: AQHU862+HHNXiouiakCm0k7H6pvGS6ZN9jqAgARhSgCAAMFWAA==
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 15:38:48 +0000
Message-ID: <9C4A5433-4490-43B3-B82B-EFFD52FF5AB4@cisco.com>
References: <CAPDSy+6S5XzmBvAB-1EEoL+2UyZFtJBQ8KwXd2gRVGrwCzjK7g@mail.gmail.com> <19C8C2DA-8B57-44B2-9457-DCB395D95D62@apple.com> <CAPDSy+4eSK1Sx3ssckj1AdX0zvYacLKmbWHO0cppoCG7CiYyHg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+4eSK1Sx3ssckj1AdX0zvYacLKmbWHO0cppoCG7CiYyHg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.18.0.190414
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jkomissa@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.73]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 68689417-a260-4c76-ae92-08d6ccb8c5e2
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BY5PR11MB4021;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR11MB4021:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 5
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR11MB4021208AF7A5504F97B5A0D0CB390@BY5PR11MB4021.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0022134A87
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(136003)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(376002)(199004)(189003)(76176011)(64756008)(66446008)(76116006)(66476007)(66556008)(66946007)(5024004)(236005)(6116002)(3846002)(5660300002)(26005)(14444005)(73956011)(58126008)(91956017)(316002)(110136005)(229853002)(256004)(25786009)(102836004)(99286004)(86362001)(7736002)(68736007)(53546011)(6506007)(478600001)(81156014)(81166006)(97736004)(82746002)(66066001)(4326008)(8676002)(6436002)(446003)(11346002)(476003)(2616005)(83716004)(6512007)(71200400001)(2906002)(53936002)(71190400001)(966005)(186003)(14454004)(486006)(6486002)(54896002)(6306002)(33656002)(8936002)(6246003)(36756003)(606006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY5PR11MB4021; H:BY5PR11MB4037.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: MzmimNadmpJOMpSrMNxMq+FJzbFx1deJrIaodgx50S36QuuOl3Cwuis5Wi/FNs2ut/Xid9hi2uHZK8A/KRuYaivSsTCwXq/r0lLCZSCdviRFMEDT1G9lzA90ED2atbeJUC8eD3EjXZtXOMzoy2E2j0hizeO0esjYZw0rNr4MRj2nxpIQKhNaiJ/kNWONboo3jGnH8ez27pQgwmI6PqN1v512fiU7occ8SrpMoOiYGiAla+6QZTN5HerILRuV5IWRJKnMrv0hlGPikOs80is9sclbNxNhgEjw1fWOJFRvBTzHk4AGIw9CWljyvz2N7uk34rIYWAZiM3OOnU57VKJeJJqgRDLsZQ3fKvBMrIPo0IRjPGmngvYX8iiLf1VgWFQU696dt+nK02SjoQkGshWRHwf+d4U3AS2l/lQ/j+LhYLg=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9C4A5433449043B3B82BEFFD52FF5AB4ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 68689417-a260-4c76-ae92-08d6ccb8c5e2
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Apr 2019 15:38:48.3939 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR11MB4021
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.27, xch-rcd-017.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/dRXtmn1DsNJFSAPiK45Pfw77UAg>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnssd-push
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 15:38:53 -0000

This draft looks fine to me.

Jan.

From: dnssd <dnssd-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sunday, April 28, 2019 at 8:07 PM
To: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnssd-push

Thank you Stuart.

To give working group members time to review this diff and your email, we are extending this WGLC by a week, until 2019-05-06.

For future reference, you can use rfcdiff with published draft names in the URL:
https://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnssd-push-16&url2=draft-ietf-dnssd-push-19<https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnssd-push-16&url2=draft-ietf-dnssd-push-19>

Speaking with WG chair hat off, I personally do not see any problem with these changes and support publication.

Thanks,
David

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:13 PM Stuart Cheshire <cheshire=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
On 15 Apr 2019, at 10:07, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:

> This email starts another Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-dnssd-push, which will last for two weeks until 2019-04-29. As a reminder, this document has already passed WGLC but some slight changes to the document warranted another WGLC.

Thank you David.

I have attached an HTML file of the output from <https://tools.ietf..org/rfcdiff<https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff>> comparing draft-ietf-dnssd-push-16 with draft-ietf-dnssd-push-19.

There are a variety of minor textual changes, such as replacing references to draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal with references to RFC 8490, now that this document is published.

In terms of substantive changes, there are two:

1. DNS Push Notification RECONFIRM

We realized that there is no useful response to a RECONFIRM request. We changed RECONFIRM to be a unidirectional DSO message, and that results in the deletion of the entire “RECONFIRM Response” section. This simplifies both code, and the document.

2. DNS Push Notification Updates

Previously, Tom Pusateri and I thought that borrowing the DNS Update encoding made sense. That was before DSO (RFC 8490).

When implementing the current specification of DNS Push Notifications over DSO, Ted Lemon discovered that it has no way to express the DNS CLASS of changes.

We need to address the problem Ted Lemon discovered, and now that DNS Push uses DSO TLV encoding instead of traditional DNS messages, the incentive to follow strictly the existing DNS Update encoding has disappeared.

To address this issue, we adopted a new, simpler, way of expressing changes.. It’s broadly similar, but simpler.

Please take a look at these changes and let us know if you see any problems..

And if you *don’t* see any problems with these changes, please respond saying that too.

Stuart Cheshire

_______________________________________________
dnssd mailing list
dnssd@ietf.org<mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd