Re: [dnssd] Adoption call for draft-sekar-dns-ul-03 into DNSSD

[ DNSOP to BCC to limit cross-posting ]

Speaking as an individual contributor, I have read the draft and support
adoption in DNSSD.

David

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 9:31 AM Chris Box <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> WG members,
>
> This email starts a call to adopt
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sekar-dns-ul-03 into the
> DNSSD working group.
>
> What is this? Abstract:
>    This document proposes a new EDNS0 option that can be used by DNS
>    Update clients and DNS servers to include a lease lifetime in a DNS
>    Update or response, allowing a server to garbage collect stale
>    resource records that have been added by DNS Updates
>
> Adoption means that formal change control passes from the authors to the
> working group. All subsequent substantive changes require WG rough
> consensus. Adoption represents a commitment that the DNSSD WG will spend
> time on the draft, with the aim of progressing it towards publication.
>
> Note that in theory the draft could fit the charters of both DNSOP and
> DNSSD, but we're proposing DNSSD as this specific functionality is required
> as part of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnssd-srp/> which is already
> well advanced. The relevant charter text is:
>
> 2. To develop an improved, scalable solution for service discovery
>    that can operate in multi-link networks, where devices may be
>    in neighboring or non-neighboring links, applicable to
>    the scenarios above.  The solution will consider tradeoffs between
>    reusing/extending existing protocols and developing entirely new
>    protocols.
>
> This email is being copied to DNSOP to solicit additional feedback from
> the expertise there, but note this is NOT a call to adopt into DNSOP.
>
> You should be aware this draft is covered by an IPR disclosure. Details of
> Apple's licensing terms can be found at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1236/.
>
> Within DNSSD we are asking two questions:
> 1) If you have read this six-page draft and are content with it, or would
> like to amend/discuss it further inside the working group, please speak up
> now.
> 2) If you believe that this document is not something the DNSSD working
> group should be working on, please also say so.
>
> For this call to succeed, we'll need statements of explicit support from
> people who have read the draft. The document does not have to be perfect,
> but it needs to be solving a problem the WG wants to solve in a way
> approximately as described in the draft.
>
> Please send statements in support or against, as responses to this email.
> This call will be open until 2021-09-03 23:59 UTC.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> dnssd mailing list
> dnssd@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd
>