IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnssd] Adoption call for draft-sctl-advertising-proxy

Jonathan Hui <jonhui@google.com> Tue, 17 August 2021 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <jonhui@google.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135363A060A for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -18.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.499, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qMtCwPU5vX3w for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97CFB3A0542 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com with SMTP id w2-20020a4a9e420000b02902859adadf0fso5526772ook.1 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fdKodc/TolxyS4nKkGfpeKUtkc0aoCvTVf8F96uK1e4=; b=NSWZk3+cRtDYdXjsjnnXlfd4p59R0DvvFoOmn3DLklU2ZeUmlJ3Wi7psICf6pRZt1O xxvW9sxlye3+dNxe1uHE5kZb9DddQIjnnRQUzP1tjt8ubwkeCC0IVAD6gbKIgLr/XHla 3M+Roi58pffURVHF0KntnK087pY6b3BsWTnlLVijxRpKyXHepaxMyiTdiV2JIZAMq0HH 2MAnDk91FJJXk3mxSJskCI3bPQkjXd5jqqm8pEJFfoMRKv5Rb+CabJActfB03eDVILhO C00kUb0hhDzG/2Rskb4bdi3/3e14HvZOjycKutRsE9Lw6uRNVt9PAwcwhB8HW7ro5vTH /yrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fdKodc/TolxyS4nKkGfpeKUtkc0aoCvTVf8F96uK1e4=; b=ld88M62AL+3SRG33W7mxEj38j4llZJqbpsxBZarX7NskXMdgUHEdMc7cCz7etIlYzq ZiutyaGJuimqeIPFKcLsXZv0YcY9G7fxTo6OMIHseMaikUJgCrXn4sSTeGRvkXZuhAv9 U8xSawc84xH7NMM21DNds+9YM9J+kQzvLYNjO7ZCR8faW5QktMBj9H36LYnFC+hn4KHo 3y3KtTKzpEcNBg0aRYoQ4dU/5Ax/V1PvCpYoqE3xEtnFQrqT+if71IpDCV6OyilHUVYU JY8wSv/jK81g2F69w2n7xrr3qe+wBpYudKnX+a7FP6IavhpEjGK3cuzWEw6rPTfFTbPZ +8Cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Hl5xqHYNpua66mLZuvw9fQoSRZ9Gx1KihQNvvrx17FYCXN31R Q2tAj4U5/5x15ddyT3TgmexpcqxUkMHYDxjkSw2/ng==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfXQnB7o9GSnrcAR45a36CnuxC9+U0C7dwZaKi8MlZCi5o/ISbj6ndqlzV0jmac0nBegs1i1q6fM1nrGDH5/w=
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:98e1:: with SMTP id b30mr946897ooj.34.1629167827529; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADPZrgS8i9iZ-UMAStNruqQbjC6d_yqteCt5ofsbhj6EWmZ-nA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=DVAj9fzV6hoUf0ehG5ixY2TWdbsU2NuFZReV9Yqx-mg@mail.gmail.com> <CADPZrgRkcYG=DgvuZxAHS6caYX8bF-qfq-jHbwb+KJMDgvP6Fw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADPZrgRkcYG=DgvuZxAHS6caYX8bF-qfq-jHbwb+KJMDgvP6Fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Hui <jonhui@google.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:36:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGwZUDvVBZ32UUjg=wDyf8KwCAAnVGEU-3E8F=rsXOGX9iUDLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Lin <simonlin@google.com>
Cc: mellon@fugue.com, dnssd@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a4367a05c9b83143"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/l1Ts9JdqUYSGydEQnA47Q7bfqL0>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] Adoption call for draft-sctl-advertising-proxy
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 02:37:12 -0000

On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 7:11 PM Simon Lin <simonlin@google.com> wrote:

>
> So, it's foreseeable that partitioning may cause many SRP name
> conflicts when SRP replication is not adopted. That being said, can we
> argue that SRP replication is less useful when TREL can significantly
> reduce the chance of partitioning?
>

It's not clear to me whether TREL would eliminate partitioning/merging
during network formation (e.g. after a power outage).

Regardless, SRP replication provides other benefits beyond avoiding name
collisions when SRP clients change servers.

--
Jonathan Hui

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email