[dnssd] Should DNSSD meet at IETF 120?

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 26 April 2024 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F902C14F6B8 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kzXFSeep-is8 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com (mail-wm1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0E77C14F61A for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-41bab13ca81so6766755e9.1 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714164652; x=1714769452; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zm69AtGud8+zIKIYDunG7HVVS5W0h4pU1ktFG8Ls11k=; b=Ew8FUT5Td8OJEdIwkqX6XzvC97YncHY9cgFV6VLLdRIAsYC91pyAL2ykFdcYfA39fa 9j+IYXGg0VXHspqXOFKHCvXPm2PtVEbXbAauHwB7w7q5SrrcjlJOV0xP0cPgbh7ZbIkp zEkOxrCpemR4yXwNErNjAwPqm7PwalV4G8CgLEHNh6O0rOT3oLMAZzIsbFVkamb1PAFe nPKBcZRT+y9nYTCtOpd3vsZluEIPbxBoYqD3anjfDYnT8s2Sx/kRO6enYg+34k9DzLKO nSWEnbut7gk1YWmagKhkOhjtEKpJTU5P1OZovSv+NnWF6S4CLpPM6kqoWUMoudyPkrDx Ikyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714164652; x=1714769452; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zm69AtGud8+zIKIYDunG7HVVS5W0h4pU1ktFG8Ls11k=; b=FiLpHZ3larQdkNDq1HCT84zjHc3pw2E1GA43jQgZYSESkN4ynUl4XOTdvtF5eUeBf2 8F8CjD4YQN4pwkqHJtl9OPaIWYBwKbITWt3stfaJd+ZOFha20WXYyOF+rfXpzKo3Qqir NFbrOvvLVWKuohStXZD8zfDyC9BDUxeIm0Nfa/GYkGC+Gip3kJOQWsTx3zfFEYvR/zjG Ojkr9WLvqfL0OdLFgqPiuvlNb0+Xl7ec4d8fKxflwZh1jx7uq0NeitA2pO4D7hZ5EJgi IjJzQR8cZOl/t22pa6uTQqqMFaYyTXRFgDtqI2q0XuZSyANceXBBJm4C5rCqonuoMsxb ZduA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxK9aY+hXth4aQpW30Q/GV5hwYGCLI0luAHM0hXnknXqY7Zpprw dmVOEQ0j18DffJtBFqZzV+EYxuMmFirM4SXZCXzVRXT1scadb2B9s1Ao5DUDq/1orIY+DvvzX+/ YP+zzucTnVESnc49vPtj5/EdRtXtOlw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHtQKuq7LpkxzJekSdj6Hho/W+Cp2Dqzkj4ExM9o997rWA746xbKLqRih4RP2aSGq8YGinwA3LJujDIaB6iVU4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:524c:b0:418:fb6f:5f3d with SMTP id fc12-20020a05600c524c00b00418fb6f5f3dmr3311857wmb.17.1714164651869; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:50:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+7gZpCm=jXizvKwx9Lm_dB+7fb1OMyWmyL89TiYoEdCjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000294e350617060f03"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/m8-bTg2AqAMj_QL6zoidFjSPeaw>
Subject: [dnssd] Should DNSSD meet at IETF 120?
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 20:50:56 -0000

Hi DNSSD enthusiasts,

Planning for IETF 120 has started. The chairs are wondering whether DNSSD
should meet at IETF 120 in Vancouver this July. Please share requests for
agenda items (including expected durations) in response to this email. If
there are sufficient requests, we will schedule a session. The requested
length will also depend on the agenda requests we receive.

Additionally, we would like to hear feedback about our session at IETF 119
in Brisbane. As a reminder, we tried something new by having a joint
session with SNAC. We're interested in any thoughts you might have about
that experiment. In particular, is this something that we should consider
repeating?

Thanks,
David