IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnssd] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnssd-privacy-01

Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> Sat, 08 July 2017 00:54 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472B51316F0 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 17:54:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xKq9aRkRoC-e for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 17:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com (mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com [138.201.61.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BDD71316AC for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 17:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xsmtp31.mail2web.com ([168.144.250.234] helo=xsmtp11.mail2web.com) by mx43.antispamcloud.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1dTe0n-0004BX-9p for dnssd@ietf.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 02:54:17 +0200
Received: from [10.5.2.15] (helo=xmail05.myhosting.com) by xsmtp11.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1dTe0k-0001v8-IN for dnssd@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 20:54:15 -0400
Received: (qmail 10338 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2017 00:54:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.103]) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[172.56.42.115]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail05.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <dnssd@ietf.org>; 8 Jul 2017 00:54:14 -0000
To: dnssd@ietf.org
References: <CF1BAEAE-41C7-4E69-AD6F-9F31E7C7B2A3@jisc.ac.uk> <20170625210709.GA829@sources.org> <28c0ad99-2905-64b6-52c2-a357e7fa6d12@huitema.net> <20170626184107.GA8291@sources.org> <f43abe80-780d-8ae6-26f6-068539d943c4@huitema.net> <20170707185208.gmwm7d543nkst4je@mx4.yitter.info>
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Message-ID: <061b9243-96cc-a013-4179-247ce677f42d@huitema.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 17:54:10 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170707185208.gmwm7d543nkst4je@mx4.yitter.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: 168.144.250.234
X-SpamExperts-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-SpamExperts-Username: 168.144.250.0/24
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=168.144.250.0/24@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: unsure
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.15)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: PqwsvolAWURa0gwxuN3S5YEa3T7JuZT23fGO2rGt3ZgTCGhDnudOJ80D1c8rffxrus7BTv7Ss8cH d2IQQuvdbtM+m4WpRRDP6YzwkAPgQJY8hyefn/FOeAH6Zsqubs62ND46yZLY9QyX+cRXmooQ3hum JwiT+2brWmQlzkLIcXivpIH4ag6BM/+u9ym+BA23mtOhneO6JzSHHvenModLN1ARmtUrs5uctmY2 TZP5WVNeFZ39K2u6nQRXxi0P789GYOEkjsX7F8KmpUaZQHV+SWsC1ltxhvDAAiytf1zpGXO2G5Pj 7iQJEmtNUzH3idZ6uMF2OhyCCCV83x+RZrKIj0QqMGQOSwmEPwP4wBzM77N8GvkYGGDFjg9NrmGY yNnXsSjdYwfRhjHqxQXDsBKLpKOHi0RYvlOYvJoUtCbvS/b6lO4FGen962xgCFRckncKfg1XSK9P 1z/R6plfrFWGySn63Q2J9zYyXzG2E1nT+GDeNHk15VolAGHS5rCXQKDym+Gab6cuAPzLi/SdAxlO dgkraHgbbAuZgv0Q6mJ3vUcipz1IT62ZEk6+MmovaufbiR3bHfnMCIEU+nrglojKwMr3vOY18GvB wSXAfWcj234Kahp30YSTh5OL3yMqjF0jNdSMuNhZC3X/nGdDKYyg+1Fotn1TGspRGWfHjmaruO0b XpkevaElTi+sCWwmqxHi+BUHXGjp0J8FpT+J6AFTxiSsoNTiR/GmpPv4QzJ0uLs078I0y+3uS4dN KiUgYTBUfgSNuXxLpYVSdRMrreeW5IAbiteDwjw8P7mx/NBHSRWxZaHLvUGmD7PXY2RS8idsz7fr MHsNPRylYAkPvY1HttQOF909qtkcRbvucYBIc/SWdEVhFWVNeXUVBER+dDF8MLn6MURQGfriekzS 9Ga3AA==
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine5.antispamcloud.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/mHENEmqijNWqOadq5rjYP0nl4UU>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnssd-privacy-01
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 00:54:21 -0000


On 7/7/2017 11:52 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:07:22PM -0700, Christian Huitema wrote:
>> In fact there is a solution, which I implemented in my tests. Given a
>> clock precision X, the device knows that its real clock could be
>> somewhere between T-X and T+X. There are a finite number of time stamps
>> in that interval, and it should be ready to accept them all. Or query
>> them all, if it is doing polling.
> Surely, then, as Stephane suggests the document should say _that_ instead?
That's what we attempted to say in draft-02, based on Stephane's feedback.

-- 
Christian Huitema

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email