Re: [dnssd] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnssd-push-10 (extended to 14th April)

Ralph Droms <> Thu, 13 April 2017 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDBE12EB40 for <>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yqXFvXmjlxzB for <>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100AF129A96 for <>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id v3so56298429qtd.3 for <>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=oBxU7zZdoMaLQPeO6emX/Bek440xkP1OAtpizA7lG7g=; b=L5WSEsk0/1p17lCaO5JpzzW5wiGj+75Jfa4c2PMw1NkDigdKHVhiTODnK2lT8nttXY ZN08TBGwkiS/+VH4/DDa5dxcYo5EtFulmwUaPk9c6vl/IDJCCI4xr1Cg9ysv+4940wzz 26H14M7dCGwHiD3uEVI8vJk0iI/hM/uqkE0sYwSJxsq5MGRQacvgrAClIjWwCdqtWkg4 fALAeVXBAxzrR7dq1Qy9hvogGj5nzSAnUlK6cfaH0eDasw6CUAkjednzL2DHVK5VrWjG BS7Xl+0MdETKeGcXChpjxVgrDHm2dT0CZNpHfBaW1JcPPOxyV3QMEyDCyt4RPAdjE4X/ UNoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=oBxU7zZdoMaLQPeO6emX/Bek440xkP1OAtpizA7lG7g=; b=ew7J73vWl2Av8FVBK9N+GyGxnQGJ0uzoanzGXhUa37kQIcEOUeOnyD4tb0KpFr0RBk 10wIL0GcYurppolZnVbwu8t74lz9lUwTXtJ2WLKuBrk/tYc0ijHxa6Q2F3VuYKVOgQeR 6vmqe9XeWt4TgZaJSiKd8JB+Al8ISt2BAzOBnh1QXuSK3lb5gBvexJlEMsxFyWQZmZ5y QpXNxK7NNTunckCXCj9rMZvCtia8DyvTtQ+AqDBJPptMDYHJPolzJpmGoUgJActPNKjs 0l3KSlM2ogtRTot30anvYSU1GCAJLphB9iPf3gOvLj2+Df94bmN5lrFzcYrY6GOD8Kby 0XOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6FD139qkVXxAL+Yr41x2yLBOf9URCbbQ6ELi5OSTuGk1mNTaOM ZQ3bRzJ0J9/QEQoy5cg=
X-Received: by with SMTP id t9mr4608798qtb.182.1492122402043; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18f:801:600:4c01:b47:1703:8517? ([2601:18f:801:600:4c01:b47:1703:8517]) by with ESMTPSA id o91sm46742qte.42.2017. for <> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ralph Droms <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 18:26:38 -0400
References: <> <>
To: "" <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnssd-push-10 (extended to 14th April)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 22:26:45 -0000

I think draft-ietf-dnssd-push-10  is ready to be forwarded to the IESG, after the following comment is addressed:

I found the second item in the list in section 6.1 confusing:

6.1.  Discovery

   The first step in DNS Push Notification subscription is to discover
   an appropriate DNS server that supports DNS Push Notifications for
   the desired zone.  The client MUST also determine which TCP port on
   the server is listening for connections, which need not be (and often
   is not) the typical TCP port 53 used for conventional DNS, or TCP
   port 853 used for DNS over TLS [RFC7858].

   1.  The client begins the discovery by sending a DNS query to its
       local resolver, with record type SOA [RFC1035], for the domain
       name to which it wishes to subscribe.

   2.  If the SOA record exists, it MUST be returned in the Answer
       Section of the response.  If not, the local resolver SHOULD
       include the SOA record for the zone of the requested name in the
       Authority Section.

The second sentence seems self-contradictory: "If the SOA record doesn't exist, include the SOA record in the Authority Section."

Minor editorial nit:

In the "NOTE:" at the end of section 6.2.1, s/were/where/

- Ralph

> On Apr 6, 2017, at 4:59 AM, Tim Chown <> wrote:
> Hi,
> We have had no comments on this WGLC.
> In order to progress the draft to our AD/IESG we need some positive expressions of support; please do try to find some time to read and comment on the document.
> We’ll extend the WGLC until next Friday, 14th April, given we are also waiting on a WGLC for the DNS session signalling draft used by DNS Push.
> Many thanks,
> Tim & Ralph
>> On 21 Mar 2017, at 11:24, Tim Chown <> wrote:
>> Dear dnssd WG participants,
>> We are initiating a WG Last Call today on draft-ietf-dnssd-push-10, which you can find at
>> The call runs for two weeks, and will thus close on Tuesday 4th April.
>> Please send any comments, which includes indications of support for progression of the document as is, to the list.  Such statements of support are important; this draft will not be advanced for publication unless there is sufficient response and support from the WG.  
>> There will be a brief opportunity to also make comments in the dnssd WG meeting in Chicago next week, but the chairs would appreciate a record of comments to the list.
>> We are expecting the associated DNS session signalling draft to also go through WGLC in the dnsop WG in the next couple of weeks, with the aim of both documents being published together.
>> The DNS-SD Discovery Proxy (formerly the DNS-SD Hybrid Proxy), which Stuart has updated to reflect the new nomenclature, will be sent to the IESG once the shepherd write-up is completed.
>> Best wishes,
>> Ralph and Tim
>> dnssd WG co-chairs
> _______________________________________________
> dnssd mailing list