Re: [dnssd] SRP: support of SRP message with zero service?
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 07 December 2022 11:15 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F56C1524BB for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 03:15:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CZWS5l6Qb1Eu for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 03:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66E25C14CE53 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 03:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id x28so14765735qtv.13 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 03:15:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3aHojYUHmGJ5GmRVIrz0IsyF7QVv3VecNIp5pwKxe6I=; b=G4bYa3W932UNYkJOpRIDRezPX9jqaC+aP8xIH0mmwhglo9NrFImWv6QEfHMB00OsVS XvBsj9z02xRUKlX+m+LFNXi/HkG8zTM4TullMXaUqY9xbt88r6FStY9Ko3bRuTpe/trz iak7TMxgiXqCJXZny3uMVUC88juYprdgW4uNB2EJKfHsJFiqF9/4pI2SflYMJKnaio0N YFGeeQAQqajIOt69KRSjviY0xZfeZgIiLsZaDtkdrwribSFiYILRU5gMnUC6G2UQbMRK TuTACyNeiqkJbcJkBr5kEe8lVzK0m1/Xl8u/sZz1R8x1fEGTsAKY0K5t1BeX4W815dq8 +AIQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=3aHojYUHmGJ5GmRVIrz0IsyF7QVv3VecNIp5pwKxe6I=; b=cN/VeDri8wzkpE/uwu33O5dPh7a24fiNR7Qr7D/kGI8Qx4+ysXQy24z0UdsJmbijvx ldgnEfJjJls5Q/JM9q4RwYyqHB0wP+510NodBLXQ1ROUFENTmUCAj9DHJQUtbD5NvwH/ JrkslcXjhLF14N5uVScjzMZWJHMN1aManISvljMGfeTeVAT+X3M6ofJl2i87peL8DyGa eS5qv5l34EDe6sjUGBuPKGV8Ot1jo9E2QsjGB4fDtPWm6F63Ygu2aCk39niwd2jYrokI Ul/L1Q9E8/l7Io186wIdG+Z6mbm/vk7hHhi2w+DW55XpYHI7gZqEJmmGIfCkjmZbR/fD SRCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plrKt+ID3gZgqd3+fxQ5CP6RCuSw4yI3nFxq/OJKzxE9HRJYfpR j5Fl8uGllFl6k9bOX9nVkLaWxtHmrWy4G3lkh37cJg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6MHGQcvN9nOY/Swg9ELS/McyaYNpzV0Y21+RskL9+zgjxJ1ri9yMpcfutnyj1a1UGQY8TPdO2HQAy25l1R8P0=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:74c8:0:b0:3a7:eb5d:73e4 with SMTP id j8-20020ac874c8000000b003a7eb5d73e4mr5319190qtr.250.1670411725834; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 03:15:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJ5Rr7ZTujqf3_CR-PY1Kdj1KTFAKQKcPbmZORXOxW+8TMquVw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ5Rr7ZTujqf3_CR-PY1Kdj1KTFAKQKcPbmZORXOxW+8TMquVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 06:15:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=aPfTpSdVbWTSBVi27SAr_uGwhuG03z6MNGRBdzZyqkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kangping Dong <wgtdkp@google.com>
Cc: Abtin Keshavarzian <abtink@google.com>, DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>, Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, Jonathan Hui <jonhui@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008c1ecc05ef3b0913"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/nnpqlnNDJkvSB8T0tDPZCfT6PfI>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] SRP: support of SRP message with zero service?
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 11:15:28 -0000
Why is it useful to have a hostname and address generally? :) Op wo 7 dec. 2022 om 06:09 schreef Kangping Dong <wgtdkp@google.com> > Hi, > > Regarding SRP registration, it's unclear if at least one "Service > Description Instruction" is required in a SRP message when the host is not > being deleted. > If it's not required to register at least one service, what's the use case > of registering only the host/address? Any examples? (It doesn't seem to be > useful > to advertise only the host name and addresses with the Advertising Proxy :) > > Thanks! > > > > BRs, > Kangping >
- [dnssd] SRP: support of SRP message with zero ser… Kangping Dong
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: support of SRP message with zero… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: support of SRP message with zero… Esko Dijk
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: support of SRP message with zero… Kangping Dong
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: support of SRP message with zero… Joe Abley
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: support of SRP message with zero… Esko Dijk
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: support of SRP message with zero… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: support of SRP message with zero… Kangping Dong
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: support of SRP message with zero… Esko Dijk
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: support of SRP message with zero… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] SRP: support of SRP message with zero… Michael Richardson