[dnssd] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-05: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 02 March 2020 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C825B3A0042; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 02:06:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq@ietf.org, dnssd-chairs@ietf.org, dnssd@ietf.org, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>, dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.119.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <158314356779.20288.747863183466626220@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 02:06:07 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/rmE5kGqC8IhcMRg1jA3vCEUs6Rc>
Subject: [dnssd] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 10:06:08 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

nit sec 2:
"on-link  An on-link attacker is [...]; thus, the external attacker
      is in the same multicast domain."
s/external attacker/on-link attacker/

I agree with Barry that at least RFC6763 and RFC7558 should be normative references.

Also thanks for the quick reply to the TSV-ART review (and thanks Tommy for the review!)!