[dnssd] Should DNSSD meet at IETF 110?
David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 06 January 2021 12:28 UTC
Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BEB3A045E
for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 04:28:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id aWWwK9c1_kxC for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 6 Jan 2021 04:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 906673A046A
for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 04:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id j1so1481092pld.3
for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:28:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=QomYGfXWc9pq2W1Q0Ar24+JTVEFcwO0mu2IUBAe+c88=;
b=Oqfxr5FD6f/2KQglwA8gsxR5XapzJ7CUy3h6SXKVvHjy16Py2WN7joev3kqOldLok7
NwknTCvxPBa+iSf2TueDUy9O/BSo39dPZtSqj6lJzD7l4wXb/sqvQ8/UDexD066KRNIt
7mdGVS6cFuYt5hoeO0mit9fOz/fm21HY2Dc56PuUENHJZZGpKcLu5dI8SDRsI+1AM4Z3
fTk7IdWKKvKDfcbXOT2YNHvo08BiCF++QN2uY7cvmnp3MW0J8kx8fhbO+WuGA0ebwg/q
zZEjYM1Sifb6QZgYT4XXHfThpp75CbO/yaw8XmBuiANSkGBhW7yVA4CbIoFZ0/VNpa0J
3lqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=QomYGfXWc9pq2W1Q0Ar24+JTVEFcwO0mu2IUBAe+c88=;
b=mlu3ar/duxsOOovLLjHkGNa1czqC+92g4guTDL5bgrBh5+d7AlD9vgisEzjhyW+ozg
npMHulKM65ZF7YN7IyC4sNGCTsiumlJNViLS0n22z12K3NUMBZFaxGG06Q4cKiB1Oahw
zhmvKNH0kZ6YmaUYhRg1wolUqkdicjv4Tpw0YX/iYJBS58v9cVs5zAvolIWnVrYKit2O
Eqs7l24pMHbi2BIwUnfxjxZ9s2fFL6PyIQqzRyEAE/YvqiDX+EGVFIeJopDyY+414RM0
BpONK3jS07vmujb9jUAh5odjzUWQo3LRy28IWhHtMxtE/IcH6ublyWYBbt2yn90b+wyM
o7Rg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PD7+A76vrt19QCS6y4fwH0FLKI9IsdcrauLVxneACwcPofE3s
bBy4fegjG/9V8FkiAZX7L4on6GoMar1ILnrMuIojnD1x2KU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKh6CO464I5XywD5iKBtfnvOq7AtGeL8IhoPYlWSzls+UhTo4JpCxrEKuFb9z49RFG7vjVwwy9OlWaWf4D9DU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c215:b029:da:b079:b9a3 with SMTP id
21-20020a170902c215b02900dab079b9a3mr3915685pll.67.1609936093855; Wed, 06 Jan
2021 04:28:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 13:28:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+7f4V8s7d_w1oJ-MdE3v0c6a_7NwPb8Q-veA6V-KHr0Nw@mail.gmail.com>
To: DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>, Barbara Stark <bs7652@att.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fc43cc05b83a74d8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/rxYy3_FefumD_LjyOvuPwQHQAbY>
Subject: [dnssd] Should DNSSD meet at IETF 110?
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed
networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>,
<mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>,
<mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 12:28:16 -0000
Hi DNSSD enthusiasts, Happy New Year 2021! Are there DNSSD topics that you would like to discuss at IETF 110 (early March 2021, virtual)? If yes, please share them here. In particular, the chairs would like to see discussion of those topics on the list to justify scheduling an in-virtual-person meeting. The deadline for requesting a meeting is 1/22, so please start these discussions ASAP so the chairs can make a determination before then. Thanks, David for the chairs
- [dnssd] Should DNSSD meet at IETF 110? David Schinazi
- Re: [dnssd] Should DNSSD meet at IETF 110? Ted Lemon