Re: [dnssd] Should DNSSD meet at IETF 113?

Hi DNSSD enthusiasts,

Based on the responses received so far, it sounds like no one has a
pressing need to meet at IETF 113.
DNSSD is therefore not going to have a meeting at 113, and we'll schedule
an interim in April or May.

Cheers,
David

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:54 PM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Which is of course a valid explanation ;-)
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> -éric
>
>
>
> *From: *David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 19 January 2022 at 00:26
> *To: *Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
> *Cc: *Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [dnssd] Should DNSSD meet at IETF 113?
>
>
>
> Hi Eric,
>
>
>
> The issue here is that our authors are going to be very busy with their
> day jobs until at least IETF 113, so scheduling an interim before then
> wouldn't help much. We're going to meet after IETF 113 so they get the time
> to work on the documents.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 2:02 PM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> Or should the interim be scheduled before IETF-113 ?
>
>
>
> Just asking, no pressure applied ;-)
>
>
>
> -éric
>
>
>
> *From: *dnssd <dnssd-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of David Schinazi <
> dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 22:07
> *To: *Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
> *Cc: *DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [dnssd] Should DNSSD meet at IETF 113?
>
>
>
> Thanks Ted,
>
>
>
> This makes sense to me, especially given how easy it's been to schedule
> virtual interims. If anyone would rather meet at IETF 113 because they have
> something time sensitive to discuss, please let the chairs know. If no one
> does so, we won't schedule a meeting at IETF 113, and plan to have an
> interim in April or May.
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 5:48 AM Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>
> Since nobody has jumped in to respond to this, I will just restate
> publicly what I said privately to David, which is that the March IETF
> meeting comes at a time when I'm just off of a major deadline at
> work (every year, unfortunately), and so from my perspective it would be
> more productive to have an interim a few weeks or a month later, so that I
> have time to update the documents that I owe the working group without
> having to rush to get them done by the meeting cutoff. I realize that I'm
> not the only person whose needs should be weighed here, but my vote is to
> not meet in March, but to instead meet in April or early May.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 7:27 PM David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi DNSSD enthusiasts,
>
>
>
> IETF 113 will be a hybrid meeting in Vienna on the week
>
> of 2022-03-21, meaning that it will be possible to both
>
> attend and present both in-person and remotely.
>
>
>
> Does anyone have DNSSD agenda items for that meeting?
>
> If we have enough items, we will schedule a DNSSD meeting.
>
>
>
> Note that the deadline for the chairs to request a session is
>
> 2022-02-04, so we'll need to hear back from you several days
>
> before that.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> dnssd mailing list
> dnssd@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd
>
>