[dnssd] DNDSD not meeting at 109?
David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 18 September 2020 16:23 UTC
Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317433A1117 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5QDHW-KUqmXD for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 232773A110D for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id y17so6752517lfa.8 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=umch3ZeebLdmBgOEvaeU9v4aotj44ViDaddRhohTsFw=; b=AjSEHbhHlJZt946H05Ee1kxdQoM5rjmzeEzoXSja0ECamfWuVT2x9gCYTjZ6Y+AIGv XYa7IHEJEj0RxGIONdhJVjDNmD9q2lY2jR+djActdt7ENCLOTRrRKKUuECuiFHUHXmrZ wES4aBRkllGIIYAgnWHosq6MrH6N1PXKyXJaWW1NDed4XypR4oPSp2zPV56haSq1kHey maMUDS3/q6c/Vx4YBNk6wHQyyTNmboT7AkGjzJFxAyRyQKXfp9p5ShPuX7gZ88ES1g7i oWeaKznG0RnpraHkggvKMTEo7lBi1a8YMZlULzBZq3LWq/CcVS/3LUSgH1oHcZeMmDjM ujHg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=umch3ZeebLdmBgOEvaeU9v4aotj44ViDaddRhohTsFw=; b=F17htA3FgBhot0rK63bKdMAuTZCnSVq7Ua8BACMLMZhRToNyRNmfgg7IjHdWkUBwQA Wmuql3W+KHWAdlQ5rSBxqPfH2wLPCcNGK5Em9ua8rC3gbwoEpVa5NRyd53kg4nNmXppt uugQbVi8PKdD732M0KCKDua2WJ1i8AjmHS5IQKNLqC6wiKU+15PRkZgFygIodNPCUe7x ajGx1keaKMlVZP93UWlOFqn7rQY8o5B/NyPoXrVeI+dIVpz0VeOA7PUBXEM8McUqiRl2 BKJRDdzEcfs/4JcehvbVtn1yuTiTcheVk9OaWfgUO8TtW8Mmna5xu1fTGLmgPCjcmIf+ VGZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532p/hheMJISWwY4DzO1TRgOfRG5cLbXesFu3S3TfPFx6x81Bitp QhsHBdCiQCGz6EJokKTQ8Ln+PFx4GNctISK7fhps2C3C
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkXGkMd5lxJ+/GEgXwMAe/fOtrcW2NaOa1TGWL6BMs/aiYubQ6ncxBlG+uJjNeHnONMIqcOTWaeX7y+JgJcrI=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:8906:: with SMTP id l6mr13181466lfd.136.1600446231039; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:23:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+7St7R-eRbdcKK0pS7KsL0sTH4YryZfi0Bciz5bOtgHMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000015520e05af98ed92"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/tvqyGhLAro3Y7NOw6Hx6xqeqZ84>
Subject: [dnssd] DNDSD not meeting at 109?
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:23:55 -0000
Hi DNSSD enthusiasts, The chairs haven't seen much activity on here lately, so we're thinking of not scheduling DNSSD at IETF 109. If you think we should have a session, please reply here with the agenda items you had in mind. Thanks, David and Barbara
- [dnssd] DNDSD not meeting at 109? David Schinazi
- Re: [dnssd] DNDSD not meeting at 109? Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnssd] DNDSD not meeting at 109? David Schinazi