Re: [dnssd] SRP Update - removing individual services (draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-06)

Jonathan Hui <jonhui@google.com> Sat, 19 December 2020 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jonhui@google.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E696C3A0B06 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:07:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yKWpZHGVw6lr for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:07:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com (mail-oi1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF9D13A0B02 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:07:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id x13so6487388oic.5 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:07:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FDZoOSagD6//A6NFMTIy0Hw7BLS7t5XbY7tGO8hkei0=; b=vcFX/J7noeJByILYgaeU6OoqLymck7M2vgHr2LK/QvVUvsm0uyOYlIxCPi68Ym8j1K Nf/ANynbHxb9afVyUfLgy3f5rRTQYT/ERlUO5kxpjZQAwuMs/qyrK19kOxS1ap10Adt+ C7H79bbSI7jfFyk2r9U6yHQoxojzWHu1Eoj2YByzaNLhJtXt9aN9KghG/HAm4xZ46yBg htyPhiWJFirmvRrQbniBxhy7l4FQ+UhogPSEko8avPFfJXjIIrl4FLGsVBxraCi+dtVD FUuPIAmJHo4Jv1r+xA/GAIw5ndIAUeyJRjC85nHP0f3/owvIdbsaeb70BR6i0rbMB4fW AcSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FDZoOSagD6//A6NFMTIy0Hw7BLS7t5XbY7tGO8hkei0=; b=QLcmP/oIQX/INhJjHb8nDEYjnAyFwdNn6v2E8Oq2lClTz/5SFYQkGIkeZoqCyEO+fX pmHnk/4d05S/ien97e4SIh6m5pbYe825pGZ8yve32eX2MbRW0VIR52VfK+oDuqHqGWko JALJsWV00aG81DR6X9m2QXDdLFjAGdjKEwnl8pBIj91zXlACvCaMsluWV6W4UiKB38Nm tljerkvc6qVrVePmagvtvqvGhYnlD9Du9eyIzlDJ1a6B3wHMKlQE6uUxk0/gjVgdejth OqrF8Lzrs7XKb12Te7mQdvimxJ7DpT6Gk0Nq5A6KwUNcM3QnKzq++9Ugv/pkD6bnsN5Z brEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kc4JU5vlaFQgy0f3iKyM5uRKq8zvple6Ra8YxMnpcv57lcZ+X dS8IpMMOGNmGOVGu6d53SsjTgK36NthPDa5TISBaNw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxgjxpe+ejZqDQg66UhBGDImf5+KPw8PBCy18ycFWe2yl/Irm3PkX1nMaahlQdlbZxJFSuZHZnKLf9rq67XNNU=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:53d2:: with SMTP id h201mr6205210oib.168.1608394075842; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:07:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACce4dTbWCVwBityepJpb5FF4Rv43+DUev_0Ka+rVT9exZrJzA@mail.gmail.com> <031C980F-D8B6-4051-8DC0-D8417FDBBD0F@fugue.com> <CACce4dQZ708aaMdvmwhEurHDSdFAvLbzwpDWz=viig_2cX75Dw@mail.gmail.com> <680A60B6-BD88-475E-91ED-48F23036A7C8@fugue.com> <CAJ5Rr7bDSMv1uPDPXppG9e4OUEU7oriK9tVKD20=P3Kgb2q=0g@mail.gmail.com> <741BC8D6-CFEF-453B-8F89-A6B102A37DAA@fugue.com> <CAJ5Rr7Yw33y2k=wo-ZXzFNP77=bucRcr2LxJxf+98e5oqK+fsw@mail.gmail.com> <6B728DF0-5EE8-4EE6-9E95-98EF4D03D865@fugue.com> <CACce4dToa2+FiYgzp5AvZjO7-UfHy5VSSZ4ED+PkHMVPBZTQAA@mail.gmail.com> <87BDE0DB-9FB0-4BB2-872D-6D045897FCBD@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <87BDE0DB-9FB0-4BB2-872D-6D045897FCBD@fugue.com>
From: Jonathan Hui <jonhui@google.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:07:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGwZUDtzkYD_XPY8dCTcSLiFWugb+u8tD1A51a9bwmorkMV5jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Abtin Keshavarzian <abtink@google.com>, Kangping Dong <wgtdkp@google.com>, DNSSD <dnssd@ietf.org>, Rongli Sun <rongli@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008d1f1f05b6d36dc9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/wyStgUWo2lJmrNzeuk8T-gz4bg0>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] SRP Update - removing individual services (draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-06)
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 16:07:58 -0000

On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 4:17 AM Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> Actually, on second thought, maybe the right thing to do is check for the
> KEY RR and not the SRV RR. If the key matches, the delete is okay. If there
> are no records on the name, the delete is okay.
>

I agree on checking for the KEY RR.

--
Jonathan Hui