IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnssd] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnssd-push-10 (extended to 14th April)

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Thu, 11 May 2017 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5410812EC9C; Thu, 11 May 2017 13:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T6sxvhej6pma; Thu, 11 May 2017 13:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (amt0.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 177A2128CB9; Thu, 11 May 2017 13:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.25.150] (69-77-155-155.static.skybest.com [69.77.155.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75EEA26AB2; Thu, 11 May 2017 16:01:36 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
In-Reply-To: <25AB58CA-3658-4554-96A6-30F4F6615A54@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 16:11:34 -0400
Cc: "dnssd@ietf.org" <dnssd@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnssd-push@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A3A8A730-83F1-489E-ACDE-EC88F74A73ED@bangj.com>
References: <43A42C9D-FC48-4AF1-9E9B-299D5B0179E1@jisc.ac.uk> <B17C4F9A-D99D-4BA1-B157-A985B0C9E35D@jisc.ac.uk> <9A671E6C-369C-48F8-A310-2BF40BA9F856@gmail.com> <25AB58CA-3658-4554-96A6-30F4F6615A54@gmail.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/y5-_lhLvq_9t3IebNISTKWQcyrM>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnssd-push-10 (extended to 14th April)
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 20:17:29 -0000

On May 10, 2017, at 1:20 PM, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Tim and I have reviewed the WG last call feedback and comments, and we've decided there is consensus to forward draft-ietf-dnssd-push to the IESG.  Stuart and Tom, please publish a rev -11 that addresses the WG comments from the WG last call thread, which we will pass along to the IESG.
> 
> - Ralph

I have completed the changes to the DNS Push document in response to the feedback we have received during the last call and will be submitting it for publication soon.

Thanks,
Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email