[dnssd] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid-07: (with COMMENT)
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 27 November 2017 20:49 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D728126C0F; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:49:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid@ietf.org, Tim Chown <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>, dnssd-chairs@ietf.org, tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk, dnssd@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.66.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151181577550.30906.10149559172837332600.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:49:35 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/ycYx8Oa1OWFiKV8IOPzZPKBIyKQ>
Subject: [dnssd] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:49:35 -0000
Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Discovery, a compromise is needed that combines the ease-of-use of Multicast DNS with the efficiency and scalability of Unicast DNS. A diagram would help here. one or more others that should be included in the list of automatic browsing domains for legacy clients. It might be clearer to point out that these are defined in 6763. types do and do not exist just the specific name queried, and no others. Nit: I think you mean "for just the" queries, and allow some time for responses to arrive. DNS TTLs in responses are capped to at most ten seconds. Is this text normative? generate authoritative signed data from the local Multicast DNS responses it receives. Off-line signing not applicable to Discovery Proxy. "is not applicable"? 10. Intelectual Property Rights Apple has submitted an IPR disclosure concerning the technique Nit: "intellectual" A mechanism to 'stitch' together multiple ".local." zones so that they appear as one. Such a stitching mechanism will be specified in a future companion document. This stitching mechanism addresses the Not a sentence.
- [dnssd] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-iet… Eric Rescorla